Sachin Tendulkar believes that in order to maintain the primacy and attractiveness of Test cricket, the focus should be on garnering more eyeballs rather than how many days the match lasts. The legendary cricketer is also finding current ODI cricket, a bit of a drag and wouldn't mind a change in format. Three Border-Gavaskar Tests between India and Australia recently ended in less than two and a half days, prompting widespread criticism of pitches, but Tendulkar said it is part of a cricketer's job to play on different surfaces.
Number of days shouldn't matter
"We need to understand one thing that Test cricket should be engaging and it should not be about how many days it lasts, five days or whatever. We (cricketers) are meant to play on different surfaces; be it a bouncy track, a fast track, slow track, turning track, swinging conditions, seaming conditions with different balls," opined Tendulkar on Sports Tak.
He also stated that, at a time when the ICC, MCC, and other cricketing bodies are discussing making Test cricket more entertaining and the No. 1 format, matches lasting three days would be beneficial. Furthermore, touring teams should not expect featherbeds and should make thorough preparations.
Conditions that favoured bat and ball
"When you tour, there are not easy conditions. You need to understand what's happening, assess everything and then start planning things. For me, the most important factor is the kind of surface that we play on because that is the heart of Test cricket.
"All the guys, including the ICC, MCC, etc, we are talking about Test cricket. How Test cricket can continue to be the No.1 format. So, if we want that, then we need to have something for the bowlers because bowlers ask a question (off) every ball and the batter has to answer that. So, if that question itself is not interesting enough, how are you going to have more eyeballs.
Sports should be result-oriented
"We should not be bothered too much about number of days. I feel it should be whether the match was exciting enough or not. Nobody wants to go back home not knowing who has won and who has lost," added Tendulkar.
He also said there was no harm in giving the new ball to a spinner if the surface so demanded.
"Instead of a fast bowler bowling an opening spell, why cannot a spinner be bowling a wonderful spell. It's just a different kind of surface we are playing on and that should also be challenging enough for batters to go out there and express themselves ... if somebody has batted well, he gets runs, simple."
Current ODI format monotonous
Tendulkar agreed that the format was becoming monotonous and suggested a way to make it more entertaining. Former India coach Ravi Shastri wanted ODI cricket to change with the times and become a 40-over-a-side affair.
"It's getting monotonous, without a doubt. There are two parts to it. One is the current format and the next which I feel that should be played.
"The current format, which has been there for a while now is two new balls (per innings). When you have two new balls, you have kind of eliminated reverse swing. Even though, we are in the 40th over of the game, it's just the 20th over of that ball. And the ball only starts reversing around the 30th over. That element is missing today because of two new balls. The current format, I feel, is heavy on bowlers." Right now, the game is becoming too predictable. From the 15th to the 40th over its losing its momentum. It's getting boring.
He opined, that while there was no harm in retaining the 50-over format, teams should alternate between batting and bowling after every 25 overs, as that will give the opponents level-playing ground and take toss, dew factor and other conditions out of the equation.
"So, both teams bowl in the first and the second half. Commercially too it more viable as there will be three innings breaks instead of two."
(To receive our E-paper on WhatsApp daily, please click here. To receive it on Telegram, please click here. We permit sharing of the paper's PDF on WhatsApp and other social media platforms.)