Threat Calls To Nitin Gadkari: NIA Finds No Evidence; Mumbai Court Returns Report Over Jurisdiction Dispute

Threat Calls To Nitin Gadkari: NIA Finds No Evidence; Mumbai Court Returns Report Over Jurisdiction Dispute

The special court, Mumbai, returns the closure report to NIA over the jurisdiction issue.

Charul Shah JoshiUpdated: Saturday, August 31, 2024, 02:47 AM IST
article-image
Union minister Nitin Gadkari | PTI

The National Investigating Agency (NIA), which recently took over the case of extortion calls made to Union Minister Nitin Gadkari, found no evidence in the case and wants to close the case. The special court, Mumbai, however, returned the report to the NIA over the jurisdiction issue.

As per the case registered by the NIA, on March 21, 2023, a caller who identified himself as Jayesh Pujari, had called the public relations office of Gadkari at around 10:55 am, demanding Rs10 crore. Pujari had threatened to kill the minister in a bomb blast if his demands were not fulfilled. Further, on January 14, 2023, the same man called had demanded Rs100 crore.

The case was initially registered with Nagpur police who during the investigation concluded that both the calls were made by Pujari, who was serving a life sentence in Hindalaga jail, Belagavi, Karnataka since 2013 for murder. The police hence had invoked the charges of UAPA to the case.

As the provisions of UAPA were invoked in the case, the case was taken up by NIA on July 13, 2023. While NIA was probing the case, the Nagpur police submitted a chargesheet against the Pujari and his associate Afsar Pasha. The NIA had sought to transfer the case from the Nagpur court to the Mumbai court. But the plea was rejected by the special court in Nagpur.

NIA, however, after probing the case for over a year, submitted a closure report for want of evidence before the special court in Mumbai.

The special judge AK Lahoti observed, “The record shows that state agency proceeded with probe and filed chargesheet before the special court in Nagpur. Hence closure report should have been filed before the special court, Nagpur, where the proceedings are subjudice.”

The court further said that there cannot be two simultaneous proceedings against the accused in two different courts for the same crime number on the same facts.

The court has now ordered to return the closure report to NIA, for it to file it before the appropriate court.

RECENT STORIES

Bhandup Murder Accused Akhtar Qureshi Still At Large 21 Days After Stabbing Victim 29 Times
Bhandup Murder Accused Akhtar Qureshi Still At Large 21 Days After Stabbing Victim 29 Times
Ghatkopar Man Dies After 9-Day Battle For Life Following Minor-Driven SUV Crash In Vidyavihar
Ghatkopar Man Dies After 9-Day Battle For Life Following Minor-Driven SUV Crash In Vidyavihar
Metro Line 4 Mishap: MMRDA Writes To Police, Demands Action Against Contractor
Metro Line 4 Mishap: MMRDA Writes To Police, Demands Action Against Contractor
HR College Moves To Online Lectures After Demolition Drive By BMC; Academic Environment...
HR College Moves To Online Lectures After Demolition Drive By BMC; Academic Environment...
Maharashtra ATS Conducts Raids In Ahilyanagar, Yavatmal Over Suspected Extremist Activity
Maharashtra ATS Conducts Raids In Ahilyanagar, Yavatmal Over Suspected Extremist Activity