Bombay HC Upholds BCI’s Power To Inspect Law Colleges, Dismisses SNDT Law School's Challenge

Bombay HC Upholds BCI’s Power To Inspect Law Colleges, Dismisses SNDT Law School's Challenge

The Bombay High Court has upheld the validity of the Bar Council of India’s (BCI) inspection notice to Smt. Nathibai Damodar Thackersey (SNDT) Women’s University Law School, ruling that the BCI’s authority to inspect law colleges is legally sound and does not violate constitutional provisions.

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Thursday, April 03, 2025, 06:20 AM IST
article-image
Bombay HC Upholds BCI’s Authority to Inspect Law Colleges | File Image

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has upheld the validity of the Bar Council of India’s (BCI) inspection notice to Smt. Nathibai Damodar Thackersey (SNDT) Women’s University Law School, ruling that the BCI’s authority to inspect law colleges is legally sound and does not violate constitutional provisions.

A division bench of Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice MS Karnik held that the notice was neither arbitrary nor illegal. The Court said that the Legal Education Rules, 2008, under which the BCI is empowered to inspect law colleges does not violate Article 14 and Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The court dismissed the law school’s contention that the BCI’s inspection powers were limited to universities and did not extend to affiliated colleges.

The petition, filed in 2019, challenged the BCI’s notices issued in August and September 2018, which required an inspection of the petitioner’s institution. The law school argued that under the University Grants Commission Act, 1956, and the Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016, universities and colleges are distinct entities, and the authority to inspect colleges lies solely with the university. It claimed that the BCI’s rules exceeded its statutory powers and unlawfully expanded its regulatory scope.

The BCI, represented by Advocate Shekhar Jagtap, defended its statutory duty to ensure that law colleges maintain educational standards. Senior Advocate Milind Sathe, appointed as amicus curiae (friend of the court), supported the BCI’s stance, emphasising that the council has a crucial role in legal education and its power to inspect universities extends to affiliated colleges conducting law courses.

Rejecting the petitioner’s arguments, the court ruled that the BCI’s rule-making authority includes inspection of law colleges to uphold educational standards.

The court also vacated an ad-interim order from 2018 that had allowed the law school’s students to enroll as advocates despite the inspection dispute. The BCI is now free to conduct a fresh inspection and take further action as per law.

RECENT STORIES

Maratha Reservation Stir: Protester Dies Of Heart Attack During Agitation In Mumbai

Maratha Reservation Stir: Protester Dies Of Heart Attack During Agitation In Mumbai

Ganeshotsav 2025: Maratha Protesters Queue At Lalbaugcha Raja, Pray For Reservation

Ganeshotsav 2025: Maratha Protesters Queue At Lalbaugcha Raja, Pray For Reservation

Maratha Reservation Protest: Azad Maidan Turns Muddy, Protesters Opt For Mumbai Sightseeing At...

Maratha Reservation Protest: Azad Maidan Turns Muddy, Protesters Opt For Mumbai Sightseeing At...

Mumbai-Surat Train Services Hit As Technical Fault Disrupts Western Railway Operations Between...

Mumbai-Surat Train Services Hit As Technical Fault Disrupts Western Railway Operations Between...

Mumbai Crime: EOW Registers FIR Against Builders, Fake Tenants In ₹6.11 Crore MHADA Tenancy Fraud...

Mumbai Crime: EOW Registers FIR Against Builders, Fake Tenants In ₹6.11 Crore MHADA Tenancy Fraud...