'Cannot Be Allowed To Work Unregulated': Karnataka HC Dismisses X Corp's Plea Challenging Centre's Authority To Regulate Social Media Content

'Cannot Be Allowed To Work Unregulated': Karnataka HC Dismisses X Corp's Plea Challenging Centre's Authority To Regulate Social Media Content

In a major setback for X, the Karnataka High Court on Wednesday dismissed the social media platform's plea challenging Centre's authority to regulate content.

Sumit SharmaUpdated: Monday, September 29, 2025, 01:02 PM IST
article-image
Karnataka HC Dismisses X Corp's Plea Challenging Centre's Authority To Regulate Social Media Content |

Bengaluru: In a major setback for X, the Karnataka High Court on Wednesday dismissed the social media platform's plea challenging the Centre's authority to regulate content.

The court said that the the country's law should be followed. It further added that social media companies cannot be allowed to work unregulated in India.

"Social media needs to be regulated, and it's regulation is a must, more so in cases of offenses against women, in particular, failing which the right to dignity, as ordained in the Constitution of a citizen gets railroaded," the court maintained.

The plea sought a declaration that Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act does not provide authority on government officers to issue orders directing to block information.

The court observed that the X corp follows the takedown orders in the United States, the place where the X was'. The US administration criminalises its violation.

"But the same petitioner refuses to follow the same on the shores of this nation of a similar takedown orders which are founded upon illegality. This is sans countenance. The petition for all the aforesaid reasons lacking in merit stands rejected," Justice Nagaprasanna noted.

In March this year X filed a petition in the Karnataka High Court, challenging the Indian government’s use of Section 79(3) of the Information Technology Act.

In the plea, the social media platform stated that the section contradicts the Supreme Court’s 2015 Shreya Singhal ruling, which upheld that content removal must follow due legal procedure.

Under Section 79(3)(b), intermediaries lose "safe harbour" protections if they fail to take down content upon government directives.

RECENT STORIES

UP: 4 Cops Attend Criminal's Birthday Bash In Ghaziabad, Suspended After Video Showing Them Dancing...

UP: 4 Cops Attend Criminal's Birthday Bash In Ghaziabad, Suspended After Video Showing Them Dancing...

Bengaluru Weather Update: Moderate To Heavy Shower Is Predicted In North Interior Karnataka; Check...

Bengaluru Weather Update: Moderate To Heavy Shower Is Predicted In North Interior Karnataka; Check...

'Pathway To Long-Term Peace': PM Modi Backs US President Donald Trump's 20-Point Peace Proposal For...

'Pathway To Long-Term Peace': PM Modi Backs US President Donald Trump's 20-Point Peace Proposal For...

Mahatma Gandhi Statue Defaced With Anti-India Graffiti In London; India Condemns 'Shameful Act'

Mahatma Gandhi Statue Defaced With Anti-India Graffiti In London; India Condemns 'Shameful Act'

Punjab News: NHRC Issues Notices Over Delayed Rehabilitation Of LPG Tanker Blast Victims In...

Punjab News: NHRC Issues Notices Over Delayed Rehabilitation Of LPG Tanker Blast Victims In...