The Allahabad High Court has directed the concerned authorities that no arrest should be made before the expiry of two-month 'cooling period' in cases of marital discord filed under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in which the maximum sentence is less than 10 years.
Besides, during this 'cooling period', the matter would be immediately referred to the family welfare committee (FWC) which will try to resolve the matrimonial dispute.
Section 498A of the IPC has provisions for punishment to a woman's husband or his relatives if they subject her to cruelty.
Justice Rahul Chaturvedi passed the order in the revision petition filed by Mukesh Bansal (father-in-law), Manju Bansal (mother-in-law) and Sahib Bansal (husband), challenging dismissal of their discharge application by the lower court.
The high court has allowed the discharge plea of in-laws, however, rejected the plea of the husband and directed him to appear before the lower court.
Regarding the misuse of Section 498A IPC, the court said 'nowadays, every matrimonial case is exaggerated manifold with pungent and caustic allegations of dowry-related atrocities against the husband and all family members'.
The court proposed the safeguards after taking the guidance from the Supreme Court judgment in the 'Social Action Forum for Manav Adhikar Vs. Union of India' case to check the growing tendency in masses to nail the husband and all family members by general and sweeping allegations.
HC condemns 'graphic description' of alleged sexual assault/dowry demand by husband
The court also condemned the 'graphic description' of the alleged sexual assault and dowry demand by the husband and in-laws.
It said, "The language of the FIR should be a decent one and no amount of atrocities faced by the informant would justify her to use such type of caustic expression. FIR/complaint is the gateway of any criminal case and decent expression would well communicate the alleged atrocities faced by her. It is not soft porn literature where graphic descriptions should be made."
In its decision, the court made it clear that only those cases would be transmitted to FWC in Section 498A IPC and other sections of IPC in which imprisonment is less than 10 years but there is no physical injury to the woman.