Bombay HC grants bail to Sathyanarayana Rani, alleged Naxal operative accused in 2019 Gadchiroli blast case

The incident involved burning of 27 vehicles of an infrastructure company and detonation of a pressure bomb in Gadchiroli in May 2019 killing 15 policemen and a civilian.

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Thursday, July 21, 2022, 08:40 AM IST
article-image
Bombay High Court | File

After “closely and meticulously” going through the material gathered by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), there is “prima facie no evidence” against Sathyanarayana Rani, an accused in the Gadchiroli Naxal attack of 2019 and husband of alleged Maoist leader and co-accused late Nirmala Uppuganti, observed the Bombay High Court while granting him bail.

The incident involved burning of 27 vehicles of an infrastructure company and detonation of a pressure bomb in Gadchiroli in May 2019 killing 15 policemen and a civilian.

A division bench of Justices Revati Mohite-Dere and VG Bisht granted bail to Rani while hearing an appeal filed by Rani challenging the August 20, 2021 order of the NIA court rejecting his bail plea.

Rani was arrested on June 11, 2019 from Hyderabad. During the search of his house, where he stayed with Uppuganti, the police recovered various electronic items and a cash of Rs 10.32 lakh. The probe was transferred to the NIA on June 24, 2019.

The prosecution claimed that Rani was publisher of Prabhat magazine which contains the details of martyred comrades.The prosecutionhad submitted a pictorial presentation of the magazine,instead of the actual copy while opposing his bail.

The court noted that the magazine nowhere reflects Rani’s name as an editor or printer or publisher. The court also observed that none of the witnesses had identified him as the person who accompanied them to a camp where they were “trained in weapon handling and bomb making for better results for police party killing”.

“We have meticulously gone through the statements of prosecution witnesses and have also given our findings as to their nature and contents thereof. The material gathered by the investigation agency quaappellant accused and presented before us does not prima face point out the involvement of the appellant-accused in the aforesaid offences,” said the court.

(To receive our E-paper on whatsapp daily, please click here. To receive it on Telegram, please click here. We permit sharing of the paper's PDF on WhatsApp and other social media platforms.)

RECENT STORIES

Daily Horoscope for Friday, August 19, 2022, for all zodiac signs by astrologer Vinayak Vishwas...

Daily Horoscope for Friday, August 19, 2022, for all zodiac signs by astrologer Vinayak Vishwas...

Raigad gun scare: AK 47, ammo found on boat; Maharashtra on high alert

Raigad gun scare: AK 47, ammo found on boat; Maharashtra on high alert

Borivli flyover potholes: BMC, MSRDC pass blame

Borivli flyover potholes: BMC, MSRDC pass blame

No blanket relief for victims of false criminal cases: Supreme Court

No blanket relief for victims of false criminal cases: Supreme Court

SC orders status quo, says Delhi HC-appointed CoA will not take charge of IOA

SC orders status quo, says Delhi HC-appointed CoA will not take charge of IOA