SC Seeks Centre & EC's Response On PIL Challenging Election Eligibility Of Convicted Individuals As MPs & MLAs

SC Seeks Centre & EC's Response On PIL Challenging Election Eligibility Of Convicted Individuals As MPs & MLAs

The SC on Monday addressed a PIL challenging the election of convicted individuals as MPs and MLAs, noting that the criminalization of politics is a critical issue. The court has accordingly sought responses from the Union of India and the Election Commission on the constitutional validity of Sections 8 and 9 of the Representation of People Act (RP Act), reports Live Law.

FPJ News ServiceUpdated: Tuesday, February 11, 2025, 10:43 AM IST
article-image
Supreme Court of India | PTI

Mumbai: The Supreme Court on Monday addressed a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the election of convicted individuals as MPs and MLAs, noting that the criminalization of politics is a critical issue. The court has accordingly sought responses from the Union of India and the Election Commission on the constitutional validity of Sections 8 and 9 of the Representation of People Act (RP Act), reports Live Law.

About The PIL

The PIL, filed by Advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, calls for life-long disqualification of MPs/MLAs convicted of criminal offenses. It challenges the RP Act’s provision that only bars convicted politicians from contesting elections for six years after serving their sentence.

Senior Advocate Vijay Hansaria, appointed as Amicus Curiae, highlighted that despite several court orders around 5,000 criminal cases against MPs/MLAs remain pending. The key issues raised in the PIL include expediting the disposal of these cases, the constitutional validity of Section 8 of the RP Act, and whether convicted individuals should be allowed to form or hold positions in political parties.

In 2017, the Court had ordered the establishment of 12 special courts across 10 states to handle these cases, followed by directions for the appointment of nodal prosecution officers and restrictions on adjournments. Despite these efforts, the situation remains dire, with 42% of sitting Lok Sabha members still facing pending criminal cases.

The Amicus pointed out the delays in the judicial process, citing factors such as the diversion of special courts' attention to non-MP/MLA cases, frequent adjournments, and delays in serving witness summons. Justice Dipankar Datta expressed concern over the prolonged delay in case disposal, reflecting the Court's frustration with the failure to resolve these critical issues.

RECENT STORIES

Uttar Pradesh: Court Convicts Man For Kidnapping, Raping 15-Year-Old Based On School Documents As...

Uttar Pradesh: Court Convicts Man For Kidnapping, Raping 15-Year-Old Based On School Documents As...

Woman Beats Up MRO For Sexually Harassing Her VRO Daughter In Andhra Pradesh's Tirupati- VIDEO

Woman Beats Up MRO For Sexually Harassing Her VRO Daughter In Andhra Pradesh's Tirupati- VIDEO

Nagaland State Lottery Result: July 31, 2025, 5 PM Live - Watch Streaming Of Winners List Of Dear...

Nagaland State Lottery Result: July 31, 2025, 5 PM Live - Watch Streaming Of Winners List Of Dear...

Dharmasthala Horror: Human Bones Unearthed At 4-Foot Depth In Alleged Mass Burial Site Near...

Dharmasthala Horror: Human Bones Unearthed At 4-Foot Depth In Alleged Mass Burial Site Near...

PM Modi And UAE President Mohammed Bin Zayed Reaffirm Commitment To Deepen Comprehensive Strategic...

PM Modi And UAE President Mohammed Bin Zayed Reaffirm Commitment To Deepen Comprehensive Strategic...