Mumbai: Plea to summon Vivek Oberoi dismissed in cheating plaint against his family

Mumbai: Plea to summon Vivek Oberoi dismissed in cheating plaint against his family

Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav said he was disallowing the relief not only on the ground that the petitioner has resorted to civil remedies but also because the court found that perusal of the entire complaint would not prima facie attract commission of the offence of cheating under the Indian Penal Code.

FPJ BureauUpdated: Sunday, November 06, 2022, 08:37 AM IST
article-image
Vivek Oberoi | Super star's bio

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea to summon actor Vivek Oberoi, his father, Suresh Oberoi, and their Delhi-based firm Yashi Multimedia Pvt Ltd for alleged cheating of an entertainment company in 2003.

Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav said he was disallowing the relief not only on the ground that the petitioner has resorted to civil remedies but also because the court found that perusal of the entire complaint would not prima facie attract commission of the offence of cheating under the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner Deepak Mehta, CEO of Mumbai’s Mehta Entertainment, initially approached a magisterial court in New Delhi with a criminal complaint againstthe actor’s family and their company, seeking issuance of summons againstthem.The complaint was dismissed. The dismissal was challenged before a revisional court and thereafter the High Court.

Dismissing the petition,the High Court said, “This court findsno justificationto interfere with the order passed by the courts below in exercise of its powers under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.” As per the complaint, the petitioner was running an event management business and organising shows of celebrities/cine stars in various parts of the USA.

According to the plea, in January 2003, the complainant was introduced to the Oberois and Mr Suresh Oberoi askedhimto organise some shows for his son in the USA and Canada. It alleged that the deal was completed and the actor’s consent was obtained to organise the shows in August or September 2003 for which $3,00,000 were to be paid to the actor.

“The complainant said that he remitted the aforesaid amount in the bank account of respondent No. 1 (Yashi Entertainment), but respondent No. 5 (Vivek Oberoi) did not turn up,” the plea alleged. It said efforts were made to resolve the issue but failed and the complainant’s money was not returned.

RECENT STORIES

Navi Mumbai: ‘Rail Rage’ Victim Changing Narrative, Claims Senior Railway Official

Navi Mumbai: ‘Rail Rage’ Victim Changing Narrative, Claims Senior Railway Official

Mumbai: District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum Penalise Indian Bank To Refund ₹15 Lakh With 9%...

Mumbai: District Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum Penalise Indian Bank To Refund ₹15 Lakh With 9%...

Shiv Sena (UBT) Leader Anil Parab Targets BJP, Shiv Sena Candidate Ravindra Waikar & Raj Thackeray

Shiv Sena (UBT) Leader Anil Parab Targets BJP, Shiv Sena Candidate Ravindra Waikar & Raj Thackeray

Mumbai Couple Duped Of ₹ 1.86 Crore In Online Trading Fraud, Case Filed

Mumbai Couple Duped Of ₹ 1.86 Crore In Online Trading Fraud, Case Filed

Mytek Launches AI-Based Platform To Help Contractors Deliver Infra Projects On Time

Mytek Launches AI-Based Platform To Help Contractors Deliver Infra Projects On Time