In a landmark ruling, the Rajasthan High Court has held that two consenting adults can live in a live-in relationship even if they have not attained the legal age of marriage.
Petition Filed for Protection from Threats
The court heard a petition filed by a 19-year-old man and an 18-year-old woman seeking protection, citing threats from their families. Justice Anoop Dhand, referring to Article 21 of the Constitution, stated that the right to life and personal liberty is guaranteed, and any threat to these rights amounts to a violation.
Couple’s Claims
The petitioners, residents of Kota, said they had voluntarily entered into a live-in relationship and had even signed a live-in agreement on October 27, 2025. They alleged that their families were unhappy with their decision and had threatened to kill them. Despite approaching Kota’s Kunhadi police station for protection, no action was taken on their application.
Government’s Argument
The state government contended that the man had not attained 21—the minimum legal age for marriage for men—and therefore should not be allowed to live in a live-in relationship.
Court Observations
Justice Dhand observed, “The state has a constitutional obligation to safeguard the life and liberty of every individual.” He further noted that live-in relationships are neither prohibited nor criminalised under Indian law.
Police Directed to Act
The court directed the police to consider the couple’s application according to the law, assess the threat perception, and ensure necessary protection if required.
