Punjab & Haryana HC says it is husband's duty to maintain wife, even if he is a professional beggar

Punjab & Haryana HC says it is husband's duty to maintain wife, even if he is a professional beggar

In a case titled Sandeep V. Suman, Justice HS Madaan dismissed a revision plea filed by the husband, who was a professional beggar, against an order directing him to pay maintenance to his wife.

FPJ Web DeskUpdated: Saturday, April 01, 2023, 02:24 PM IST
article-image
Punjab & Haryana HC says it is husband's duty to maintain wife, even if he is a professional beggar | File Photo

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has recently given an important observation regarding the liability of a husband to maintain his wife who is unable to support herself.

In a case titled Sandeep V. Suman, Justice HS Madaan dismissed a revision plea filed by the husband, who was a professional beggar, against an order directing him to pay maintenance to his wife. The Court noted that a husband has both a moral and legal obligation to maintain his wife who is unable to maintain herself, irrespective of his profession.

Background of the case

The wife had filed for divorce and an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking maintenance from her husband at ₹15,000 per month and litigation expenses of ₹11,000 pending the outcome of the divorce case. The trial court had granted maintenance at ₹5,000 per month to the wife during the pendency of the divorce case and directed the husband to pay a lump sum of ₹5,500 to his wife as litigation expenses along with ₹500 per hearing on getting marked her presence before the court. The husband had challenged this order in the High Court.

Court's reasoning

The High Court noted that the husband is an able-bodied person and even a manual laborer can earn ₹500 or more per day nowadays. Therefore, the Court observed that the maintenance awarded to the wife cannot be said to be on a higher side.

The Court also noted that the husband had failed to establish that his wife had any means of earning or was possessed of sufficient property. Hence, the Court held that the husband had a legal and moral duty to maintain his wife and the trial court's order was justified in granting maintenance and litigation expenses to the wife.

Court's decision

The High Court dismissed the husband's plea, stating that the impugned order passed by the trial court was well-reasoned and did not suffer from any illegality or infirmity. The Court held that the trial court's order was not arbitrary or perverse, and the husband was liable to pay maintenance and litigation expenses to his wife.

RECENT STORIES

Lok Sabha Elections 2024 Phase 2 Voting: Check Full List Of Parliamentary Constituencies Going To...

Lok Sabha Elections 2024 Phase 2 Voting: Check Full List Of Parliamentary Constituencies Going To...

Harani Lake Boat Tragedy: Gujarat High Court Orders Inquiry Against Former Vadodara Municipal...

Harani Lake Boat Tragedy: Gujarat High Court Orders Inquiry Against Former Vadodara Municipal...

Bangalore North Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Key Candidates, Constituency Profile, All You Need To Know

Bangalore North Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Key Candidates, Constituency Profile, All You Need To Know

PM Modi Speaks To Giorgia Meloni On Phone, Extends Greetings On Italy's Liberation Day

PM Modi Speaks To Giorgia Meloni On Phone, Extends Greetings On Italy's Liberation Day

Bangalore Central Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Key Candidates, Voter Share; All You Need To Know

Bangalore Central Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Key Candidates, Voter Share; All You Need To Know