India abstains from voting in UN general assembly

India abstains from voting in UN general assembly

India, however, unequivocally declared its opposition to torture, which is a crime under its laws.

FPJ BureauUpdated: Saturday, June 29, 2019, 10:01 PM IST
article-image
Delegates cast their votes on the annual draft resolution calling for an end to the U.S.-led five-decade embargo against the Caribbean nation, in the United Nations General Assembly, Tuesday, Oct. 27, 2015. The resolution condemning the U.S. embargo against Cuba has won overwhelming approval, with only the United States and Israel voting against it. Tuesday's vote had the highest ever number of countries voting to condemn the embargo — 191.AP/PTI(AP10_28_2015_000003B) |

United Nations: India has abstained from voting on a General Assembly resolution on examining steps to restrict trade in materials used for executions and torture, saying that that it could infringe on the rights of countries that carry out capital punishments provided for under their law "after following the due process of law".

India, however, unequivocally declared its opposition to torture, which is a crime under its laws. The resolution, which was adopted on Friday with 81 votes in favour, 20 against and 44 abstentions, asks Secretary-General Antonio Guterres to look at "a range of options to establish common international standards for the import, export and transfer of goods used" for capital punishment, torture or inhuman punishments.

Speaking after the vote on the resolution, a First Secretary in India's UN Mission, Paulomi Tripathi, said that New Delhi was "firmly committed to prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment".

"Acts of torture are punishable offence under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code," she said. "The Indian judiciary also serves as a bulwark against any such violations of human rights.

"We firmly believe that freedom from torture is a human right which must be respected and protected under all circumstances," she added. Explaining India's decision to abstain from voting for the resolution, Tripathi said: "Every State has the sovereign right to determine its own legal system and appropriate legal penalties In States where Capital punishment is statutorily provided for, it is exercised after following the due process of law."

The resolution may be considered an attempt to equate torture, which is a crime, with capital punishment, which in India is "a statutory provision, even though it is used in the rarest of rare cases", she said. Tripathi also said that the resolution was an attempt at imposing "trade restrictions in a selective manner" by linking "trade in goods and the criminal acts of torture" and has "implications on the international trading system".

-Arul Louis

RECENT STORIES

SIFAS Looks To Bolster Promotion Of Indian arts As Singapore Gears Up For Premiere Of...

SIFAS Looks To Bolster Promotion Of Indian arts As Singapore Gears Up For Premiere Of...

Singapore Changi Airport’s Q1 2024 Sees Higher Passenger Traffic Than Pre-Pandemic Level

Singapore Changi Airport’s Q1 2024 Sees Higher Passenger Traffic Than Pre-Pandemic Level

Singapore: GST Amounting to SGD 319,914 Evaded, 4 Arrested With Over 2,900 Cartons of Duty-unpaid...

Singapore: GST Amounting to SGD 319,914 Evaded, 4 Arrested With Over 2,900 Cartons of Duty-unpaid...

UFO Spotted Over New York City? VIDEO Shows Mysterious 'Flying Cylinder' Gliding High In Skies 

UFO Spotted Over New York City? VIDEO Shows Mysterious 'Flying Cylinder' Gliding High In Skies 

Palki Sharma's Speech At Oxford Union Debate Goes Viral; PM Applauds

Palki Sharma's Speech At Oxford Union Debate Goes Viral; PM Applauds