Bombay High Court cites delay in FIR, grants pre-arrest bail to molestation accused

Bombay High Court cites delay in FIR, grants pre-arrest bail to molestation accused

The complainant alleged that on August 1, 2022, at about 10 pm at a city hotel, Parth Pareek, the accused, came close to her, caught her hand and tried to take her for a dance without her consent.

FPJ News ServiceUpdated: Saturday, April 01, 2023, 08:45 AM IST
article-image
Bombay High Court cites delay in FIR, grants pre-arrest bail to molestation accused | Representative Image

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has granted pre-arrest bail to an executive of a company, who is accused of molesting a female employee in 2022. Justice MS Karnik granted relief to Parth Pareek, who works as a manager with an e-commerce portal, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs 25,000, in case of arrest. He had approached the HC after the sessions court rejected his pre-arrest bail plea.

The complaint was filed by a woman who was also working as a manager with the company since May 2022. She alleged that on August 1, 2022 at about 10pm at a city hotel, Pareek came close to her, caught her hand and tried to take her for a dance without her consent. Although she raised a grievance with her superiors, no action was taken. She was terminated from the service on January 11.

"Custodial interrogationof applicant not necessary," says HC

Four days later, a first information report (FIR) was registered against Pareek on January 16 at the Powai police station. He was charged under sections 354 (Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty) and 354D (stalking) of the Indian Penal Code.

Granting pre-arrest bail, the HC noted, “Considering the nature of the accusations and the delay in lodging the FIR, the custodial interrogation of the applicant is not necessary in my opinion. The applicant must cooperate with the investigation.”

Accused asked to attend police station whenever called

The accused has been directed not to make any direct or indirect inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with facts of the case so as to dissuade the individual from disclosing the facts to court or any police officer. Besides being warned against tampering with evidence, Pareek has also been asked to attend the police station as and when called.

RECENT STORIES

Bombay HC Refuses Interim Relief To Filmmaker Ramesh Sippy In Family Assets Case

Bombay HC Refuses Interim Relief To Filmmaker Ramesh Sippy In Family Assets Case

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...