Car not roadworthy: Mechanical inspection report saves accused in 2022 Sea-Link pileup case

Car not roadworthy: Mechanical inspection report saves accused in 2022 Sea-Link pileup case

The businessman, Mr Irfan Abdul Rahim Bilakiya, had tried in vain to get bail twice earlier.

Bhavna UchilUpdated: Wednesday, February 15, 2023, 09:08 PM IST
article-image
Mumbai: Accused in case of sea link accident which killed 5 and injured 9 gets bail | Salman Ansari/ FPJ

A sessions court that had earlier granted bail to a 40-year-old businessman Irfan Bilakiya, in custody since last October in connection with the pile-up accident at Bandra-Worli Sea Link that led to five deaths, considered his car's mechanical inspection report which stated that the vehicle was not roadworthy.

Bilakiya's bail applications have been rejected twice in the past. In the present plea, he had sought relief on the grounds of this inspection report and also, that there was brake failure.

He relied on CCTV footage which showed that he had applied brakes, due to which the red light indicators on the rear of his car lit up. His advocate told the court that Bilakiya himself had suffered grievous injuries in the mishap.

Accused was speeding

The prosecution opposed bail to him and told the court that he was speeding and had managed to cover a distance of 2,800 metres from the toll naka to the spot of the accident in only 92 seconds. It also said that he did not produce any evidence to show that the accident was caused due to brake failure.

Additional sessions judge Dr AA Joglekar considered that Bilakiya has not denied his presence at the spot and even his report in the chargesheet shows he was not intoxicated.

Car not roadworthy

It then considered the mechanical inspection report which stated that the car's mechanical condition is not roadworthy and mentioned 'cannot test' on whether brakes were working or not. The court also relied on an apex court judgment regarding giving bail when faced with two diametrically opposite versions. It said the case law has a similar set of facts.

The court also considered that the vehicle is in the name of Bilakiya's brother. The prosecution had claimed that there were 27 challans for traffic violations against the vehicle. The court noted the contention of Bilakiya's advocate that these traffic violations were not by him.

RECENT STORIES

Bombay HC Refuses Interim Relief To Filmmaker Ramesh Sippy In Family Assets Case

Bombay HC Refuses Interim Relief To Filmmaker Ramesh Sippy In Family Assets Case

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...