FPJ Legal: Ban on local train travel for unvaccinated is in public interest, Maharashtra govt tells HC

FPJ Legal: Ban on local train travel for unvaccinated is in public interest, Maharashtra govt tells HC

Senior advocate Anil Anturkar, the government's lawyer, said though such a restriction encroaches on the fundamental right to move freely under Article 19 (1)(d) of the Constitution, it is "reasonable" in view of the pandemic.

Narsi BenwalUpdated: Thursday, January 20, 2022, 08:02 PM IST
article-image
FPJ Legal: Ban on local train travel for unvaccinated is in public interest, Maharashtra govt tells HC | File Photo

The Maharashtra government on Thursday told the Bombay High Court that it has restricted entry of non-vaccinated citizens in suburban local trains only for the betterment of the public at large. The state further said that it has enough powers to impose such "reasonable restrictions."

A bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Makarand Karnik was hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the decision of the state government restraining non-vaccinated citizens from travelling in local trains.

Senior counsel Anil Anturkar arguing on behalf of the state accepted that the decision in question has indeed encroached upon the fundamental right to free movement of citizens.

"Only Article 19(1)D (free movement) is encroached certainly but we have powers under the Constitution of India to impose reasonable restrictions," Anturkar said, adding, "These restrictions are for the betterment of the general public thus these are reasonable restrictions."

Anturkar further highlighted the issues faced by citizens during the second wave of Covid. "We suffered a lot due to dearth of medical oxygen. We don't want a similar situation again. Therefore, we want to be very cautious this time and take all possible precautions to minimize spread of cases," the senior counsel said.

"While vaccination may not guarantee full immunity, it is a step to avoid hospitalization and death and thus the restrictions on train travel have been imposed to avoid extreme eventualities," he added.

On the argument by advocate Nilesh Ojha that the state is powerless to impose such a restriction, Anturkar pointed out that the Disaster Management Act confers powers on the state to take measures for welfare of citizens to contain a disease.

The senior advocate would continue arguing on Friday.

RECENT STORIES

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...

Bombay HC Asks Govt To Make State Mental Health Authority Fully Functional, Set Up 6 More Halfway...

Bombay HC Asks Govt To Make State Mental Health Authority Fully Functional, Set Up 6 More Halfway...