Mumbai: Sessions Court Denies Anticipatory Bail To Harshawardhan Sabale In ₹15 Crore Rolta Infotech Cheating Case

Mumbai: Sessions Court Denies Anticipatory Bail To Harshawardhan Sabale In ₹15 Crore Rolta Infotech Cheating Case

The court rejected Sabale’s plea, observing, “It appears that the complainant invested $1.5 million in the company of accused with no returns. The investment was made only with the sole intention of earning more profits. If no profits are earned, at least what complainant thought is a return of his principal investment amount.”

Charul Shah JoshiUpdated: Thursday, July 04, 2024, 09:21 AM IST
article-image
Sessions Court | X

Mumbai: The sessions court has rejected the anticipatory bail of Harshawardhan Sabale, promoter of Streamcast Technologies Holding Limited (STHL), who has been booked for cheating Rolta Infotech Limited to the tune of Rs 15 crore.

About The Case

STHL entered into a definitive Restructuring Services Agreement with Rolta India in 2019. It was claimed that STHL and Rolta entered into a share purchase agreement on November 12, 2018, for purchase of 10% equity shares of STHL for valuable consideration of $1.5 million. However, in its complaint to the Economic Offences Wing, Rolta alleged that it was induced to make an investment of $1.5 million in STHL based on false promises.

The applicant created a fake e-mail ID of AfrAsia Bank, Mauritius, sent numerous emails from it, and provided forged SWIFT MT 103 documents of different banks giving false assurances, it alleged. The complainant claimed after an investment of $1.5 million, in late 2019, it was discovered that STHL had been dissolved and that Rolta Infotech Ltd, which was a shareholder of said company, was not given notice of dissolution which shows that the applicant dishonestly induced complainant and his firm Rolta Group to make investment of $1.5 million.

Court Rejects Sabale's Plea

The court rejected Sabale’s plea, observing, “It appears that the complainant invested $1.5 million in the company of accused with no returns. The investment was made only with the sole intention of earning more profits. If no profits are earned, at least what complainant thought is a return of his principal investment amount.”

“This court is of the opinion that prima facie complainant was defrauded and cheated of his hard-earned money."

RECENT STORIES

Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Attacks Uddhav Thackeray Over Alliance Politics, Says 'True Face Of...

Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Attacks Uddhav Thackeray Over Alliance Politics, Says 'True Face Of...

Thane Shocker: 5 Held For Trying To Sell 7-Day-Old Baby For ₹6 Lakh; Police Bust Human Trafficking...

Thane Shocker: 5 Held For Trying To Sell 7-Day-Old Baby For ₹6 Lakh; Police Bust Human Trafficking...

Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Pays Tribute At Mumbai Gurdwara On Veer Bal Diwas, Remembers...

Maharashtra CM Devendra Fadnavis Pays Tribute At Mumbai Gurdwara On Veer Bal Diwas, Remembers...

Mumbai-Goa National Highway Expansion Stuck Amid Key Construction Bottlenecks

Mumbai-Goa National Highway Expansion Stuck Amid Key Construction Bottlenecks

BMC Elections 2026 | Sena vs Sena: The Battle For 10 Key Wards That Will Determine Who Rules The...

BMC Elections 2026 | Sena vs Sena: The Battle For 10 Key Wards That Will Determine Who Rules The...