Mumbai: Sessions Court Denies Anticipatory Bail To Harshawardhan Sabale In ₹15 Crore Rolta Infotech Cheating Case

Mumbai: Sessions Court Denies Anticipatory Bail To Harshawardhan Sabale In ₹15 Crore Rolta Infotech Cheating Case

The court rejected Sabale’s plea, observing, “It appears that the complainant invested $1.5 million in the company of accused with no returns. The investment was made only with the sole intention of earning more profits. If no profits are earned, at least what complainant thought is a return of his principal investment amount.”

Charul Shah JoshiUpdated: Thursday, July 04, 2024, 09:21 AM IST
article-image
Sessions Court | X

Mumbai: The sessions court has rejected the anticipatory bail of Harshawardhan Sabale, promoter of Streamcast Technologies Holding Limited (STHL), who has been booked for cheating Rolta Infotech Limited to the tune of Rs 15 crore.

About The Case

STHL entered into a definitive Restructuring Services Agreement with Rolta India in 2019. It was claimed that STHL and Rolta entered into a share purchase agreement on November 12, 2018, for purchase of 10% equity shares of STHL for valuable consideration of $1.5 million. However, in its complaint to the Economic Offences Wing, Rolta alleged that it was induced to make an investment of $1.5 million in STHL based on false promises.

The applicant created a fake e-mail ID of AfrAsia Bank, Mauritius, sent numerous emails from it, and provided forged SWIFT MT 103 documents of different banks giving false assurances, it alleged. The complainant claimed after an investment of $1.5 million, in late 2019, it was discovered that STHL had been dissolved and that Rolta Infotech Ltd, which was a shareholder of said company, was not given notice of dissolution which shows that the applicant dishonestly induced complainant and his firm Rolta Group to make investment of $1.5 million.

Court Rejects Sabale's Plea

The court rejected Sabale’s plea, observing, “It appears that the complainant invested $1.5 million in the company of accused with no returns. The investment was made only with the sole intention of earning more profits. If no profits are earned, at least what complainant thought is a return of his principal investment amount.”

“This court is of the opinion that prima facie complainant was defrauded and cheated of his hard-earned money."

RECENT STORIES

Japanese Delegation Visits MHADA To Explore Collaboration In Affordable Housing & Urban...

Japanese Delegation Visits MHADA To Explore Collaboration In Affordable Housing & Urban...

Mumbai Special Court Rejects Bail Plea Of Auto-Rickshaw Driver Arrested By ATS For Alleged Terror...

Mumbai Special Court Rejects Bail Plea Of Auto-Rickshaw Driver Arrested By ATS For Alleged Terror...

Mumbai: Second Accused Arrested In BARC Scientist Impersonation Case; Fake IDs, Passports And...

Mumbai: Second Accused Arrested In BARC Scientist Impersonation Case; Fake IDs, Passports And...

'Remaining Land For New Bombay HC Complex In Bandra To Be Handed Over By March 2026': Maharashtra...

'Remaining Land For New Bombay HC Complex In Bandra To Be Handed Over By March 2026': Maharashtra...

Mumbai Crime: Notorious Criminal Sajju Malik Booked For Dangerous Fireworks Display In Public; Case...

Mumbai Crime: Notorious Criminal Sajju Malik Booked For Dangerous Fireworks Display In Public; Case...