Mumbai: HC grants bail to advocate in murder case

Suresh Chavan is accused of killing another advocate and stealing his ornaments.

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Sunday, September 18, 2022, 09:03 PM IST
article-image
Bombay HC | Photo: Representative Image

The Bombay High Court has granted bail to an advocate who is accused of murdering another advocate and stealing his gold ornaments.

A division bench of Justices Ajay Gadkari and Milind Jadhav granted bail to Suresh Chavan against a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 while observing that confession made by a co-accused, in this case a man known as Sanjay Kharatmal, “though inculpatory, is not admissible in the eyes of law”. The bench also considered that the prosecution was only relying on the theory of “last seen together” to make its case.

The HC was hearing an appeal filed by Chavan challenging the order of the sessions court at Solapur rejecting his bail on October 9, 2019.

On June 8, 2019, Kharatmal invited Rajesh Kamble home and allegedly spiked the advocate’s tea. He and Chavan then allegedly murdered Kamble and dismembered his body. After stealing his ornaments, they stuffed the body parts in gunny sacks and fled.

After his arrest, Kharatmal confessed that he and Chavan had spiked Kamble’s drink and murdered him, and took the police home.

One of Kharatmal’s neighbour said he saw the three together on the date of the incident.

Another witness said he saw Kharatmal and Chavan pass by on a Honda motorcycle. He claimed that they seemed to be in a “frightened condition”.

The court noted that prima facie, this was the “only legally admissible piece of evidence against the appellant [Chavan]”.

“The prosecution has pressed into service the theory of ‘last seen together’ in the company of deceased...” the court said. The recovery of items listed in the panchnama at Kharatmal’s behest “prima facie indicates that he exonerated the appellant [Chavan] from the commission of present crime”.

“We are mindful of the fact that the confession made by the said co-accused [Kharatmal] in the said panchnama, though inculpatory, is not admissible in the eyes of the law,” it said.

The prosecution opposed Chavan’s bail stating that he had theft cases registered against him.

(To receive our E-paper on whatsapp daily, please click here. To receive it on Telegram, please click here. We permit sharing of the paper's PDF on WhatsApp and other social media platforms.)

RECENT STORIES

Navratri 2022: BJP to organise 'Marathi Dandiya' in Mumbai; ropes in Avdhoot Gupte and Vaishali...

Navratri 2022: BJP to organise 'Marathi Dandiya' in Mumbai; ropes in Avdhoot Gupte and Vaishali...

Maharashtra: Aaditya Thackeray slams Shinde-Fadnavis government for loss of Medicine Devices Park...

Maharashtra: Aaditya Thackeray slams Shinde-Fadnavis government for loss of Medicine Devices Park...

Uddhav Thackeray refused to rejoin hands with BJP fearing break in the CM’s five-year term, says...

Uddhav Thackeray refused to rejoin hands with BJP fearing break in the CM’s five-year term, says...

Pune Police to conduct forensic investigation of PFI protest video; Devendra Fadnavis says offence...

Pune Police to conduct forensic investigation of PFI protest video; Devendra Fadnavis says offence...

Mumbai: 'Was drunk', says man arrested for making bomb threat call

Mumbai: 'Was drunk', says man arrested for making bomb threat call