Kissing case: Bombay HC seeks state govt's reply on Shilpa Shetty’s plea of quashing 2007 obscenity case

Kissing case: Bombay HC seeks state govt's reply on Shilpa Shetty’s plea of quashing 2007 obscenity case

The charitable event was given bad light as celebrities were involved, advocate of the actress has said.

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Monday, January 09, 2023, 11:11 PM IST
article-image
Kissing case: Bombay HC seeks govt's reply on Shilpa Shetty’s request of quashing plea | file pic

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra Government to reply to a plea filed by actress Shilpa Shetty, seeking quashing of the 2007 obscenity case. The incident had occurred during a charitable event held in Rajasthan where Hollywood actor Richard Gere kissed Ms Shetty. 

Justice RG Avachat also asked Advocate Poonam Chand Bhandari, who had originally filed the complaint in Rajasthan, to reply within four weeks. Ms Shetty's Advocate Madhukar Dalvi argued that the video of the event clearly shows that his client had no intention of doing any obscene act. The event's objective was to spread awareness about AIDS. It was given a bad light by some disgruntled people as celebrities were involved, added Mr Dalvi. 

Discharge request for plea under section 245 pending

After the incident, a complaint was filed before the Judicial Magistrate First Class in Mundawar, Rajasthan seeking registration of a first information report (FIR) against both the actors. Subsequently, an FIR was registered under sections 292, 293, 294 (obscenity) of the Indian Penal Code, Information Technology Act and Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act.

Ms Shetty had approached the Supreme Court praying that the case be transferred to Mumbai, where she resides. The plea was accepted and the case was transferred to the Metropolitan Magistrate at Ballard Pier. 

She then filed two applications seeking discharge under section 239 (discharge after considering police report and documents) and section 245 (discharge after considering evidence) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), respectively.

The magistrate allowed her discharge under Section 239. However, her plea under section 245 was rejected as there was no provision for discharge in the summons triable case.

Ms Shetty has approached the HC challenging this rejection.

RECENT STORIES

Lok Sabha Elections 2024: PM Modi's Soft Approach Towards Uddhav Thackeray Raises Speculation Of...

Lok Sabha Elections 2024: PM Modi's Soft Approach Towards Uddhav Thackeray Raises Speculation Of...

Mumbai: Bombay High Court Clarifies Transit Rent Is Not Taxable Like Normal Rent

Mumbai: Bombay High Court Clarifies Transit Rent Is Not Taxable Like Normal Rent

Mumbai News: Man Booked For Submitting Forged Documents For Govt Job

Mumbai News: Man Booked For Submitting Forged Documents For Govt Job

Mumbai: Tree lovers Upset Over Iconic 300-Year-Old Baobab Tree’s Felling On SV Road In Santacruz

Mumbai: Tree lovers Upset Over Iconic 300-Year-Old Baobab Tree’s Felling On SV Road In Santacruz

Mumbai News: Mystery Surrounds Death Of 'Poisoned' Constable

Mumbai News: Mystery Surrounds Death Of 'Poisoned' Constable