Jhanvi Kukreja Murder Case: Mumbai Sessions Court Acquits Diya Padalkar, Says No Evidence Of Her Role In Killing

Jhanvi Kukreja Murder Case: Mumbai Sessions Court Acquits Diya Padalkar, Says No Evidence Of Her Role In Killing

The Mumbai sessions court has acquitted Diya Padalkar in the Jhanvi Kukreja murder case, ruling that evidence showed only a minor lip injury and no signs of participation in the fatal assault. The court said the prosecution failed to prove common intention, though the victim’s mother has vowed to challenge the acquittal.

Charul Shah JoshiUpdated: Wednesday, February 04, 2026, 03:48 AM IST
article-image
The Mumbai sessions court acquits Diya Padalkar in the 2021 Jhanvi Kukreja murder case, citing lack of evidence of her involvement | File Photo (Representational Image)

Mumbai, Feb 03: Acquitting 24-year-old Diya Padalkar, a media student, the court noted that she did not sustain any injury except one on her lips, indicating that she did not participate in the murder.

Mother vows to challenge acquittal
Nidhi Kukreja, the mother of 19-year-old Jhanvi, attended all hearings as an intervenor during the trial through her lawyer Trivankumar Karnani. She vowed to challenge Padalkar’s acquittal.

Court’s reasoning on injuries
The court further noted that Diya was present with the victim and Jogdhankar on the staircase and sustained a lip injury. “No other injuries were proved. Her clothes were neither blood-stained nor torn. Had she actively participated in the assault along with Jogdhankar, she would likely have sustained abrasions or contusions. This makes her involvement in the fatal assault doubtful,” the court reasoned.

No common intention established
It added, “She might have had an altercation with the victim and there may have been some shoving or scuffling, resulting in injury to her lip. However, the material on record does not support the contention that she shared a common intention to kill the victim.”

Also Watch:

Court rejects abetment argument
The prosecution had contended that Diya kept silent about the incident when she returned to the party after the assault, which made her an abettor of the crime. “Due to fear, she might not have disclosed the happenings. Merely because of her non-disclosure, she cannot be held to be an accomplice,” the court countered.

To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/

RECENT STORIES

Bombay HC Sets Up High-Power Committee Of Retired Judges To Monitor And Enforce Air Pollution...
Bombay HC Sets Up High-Power Committee Of Retired Judges To Monitor And Enforce Air Pollution...
Bombay HC Directs Maharashtra Govt To Decide On 5-Day Week For VIP Protocol Drivers
Bombay HC Directs Maharashtra Govt To Decide On 5-Day Week For VIP Protocol Drivers
Bombay HC Rules Housing Societies Cannot Demand Excess Transfer Premiums To Deny Membership
Bombay HC Rules Housing Societies Cannot Demand Excess Transfer Premiums To Deny Membership
Mumbai News: Special Court Closes ED Money Laundering Case Against MCX, Jignesh Shah After CBI...
Mumbai News: Special Court Closes ED Money Laundering Case Against MCX, Jignesh Shah After CBI...
Jhanvi Kukreja Murder Case: Mumbai Sessions Court Acquits Diya Padalkar, Says No Evidence Of Her...
Jhanvi Kukreja Murder Case: Mumbai Sessions Court Acquits Diya Padalkar, Says No Evidence Of Her...