Bombay High Court Upholds Society's Right To Recover Long-Pending Maintenance Dues

Bombay High Court Upholds Society's Right To Recover Long-Pending Maintenance Dues

The Bombay High Court upheld a cooperative housing society’s right to recover long-pending maintenance dues from flat occupants, ruling such dues are recurring liabilities not barred by limitation. The court dismissed a petition by two elderly occupants without registered ownership, stating occupants enjoying benefits are liable for payments under special recovery provisions.

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Monday, January 19, 2026, 12:29 PM IST
article-image
Bombay High Court Upholds Society's Right To Recover Long-Pending Maintenance Dues | Representational Image

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court, on Friday, upheld the right of a cooperative housing society to recover long-pending maintenance and service charges from flat occupants, ruling that such dues are a “recurring and continuing” liability and are not barred by limitation merely due to passage of time.

Petition Dismissed

Justice Amit Borkar dismissed a petition filed by two elderly brothers – Aspandiar Rashid Irani, 96, and Gustad Rashid Irani, 86 – who had challenged recovery proceedings initiated by Pasayadan Cooperative Housing Society, Thane. The petitioners had entered into an unregistered development agreement in 1996 with a developer, under which they received possession of four flats as consideration.

Though they occupied the flats since 2007, they were never formally admitted as members of the society. In 2023, the society raised a demand for arrears of maintenance from 2005, followed by recovery proceedings under Section 154B29 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act).

The petitioners argued that the recovery was barred by limitation, that they were not members or flat owners due to absence of a registered agreement under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA), and that prior to the 2019 amendment to the MCS Act, recovery proceedings could not be initiated against nonmembers.

Justice Borkar held that Section 154B-29 provides a special and overriding mechanism for recovery of society dues and does not prescribe any period of limitation. “When the legislature creates a special right and provides a special remedy with finality, the normal law of limitation does not automatically apply,” the court said.

On the issue of ownership, the court held that even in the absence of a registered agreement, persons who occupy flats, pay taxes and enjoy benefits of the society can be made liable for dues. If the petitioners acted as promoters under MOFA, they could not avoid their statutory responsibilities, the court ruled.

To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/

RECENT STORIES

'Should Be Ashamed': Devendra Fadnavis Slams Congress’ Harshvardhan Sapkal Over 'Tipu Sultan Equal...
'Should Be Ashamed': Devendra Fadnavis Slams Congress’ Harshvardhan Sapkal Over 'Tipu Sultan Equal...
Thane Crime Branch Busts Chain And Mobile Snatching Racket, Solves 16 Cases Across Region
Thane Crime Branch Busts Chain And Mobile Snatching Racket, Solves 16 Cases Across Region
Thane News: Former Bhiwandi Mayor Vilas R Patil Arrested By EOW Ahead Of Crucial Mayoral Poll
Thane News: Former Bhiwandi Mayor Vilas R Patil Arrested By EOW Ahead Of Crucial Mayoral Poll
Bhiwandi News: BNCMC Launches School Awareness Drives To Mark 350th Martyrdom Year Of Guru Tegh...
Bhiwandi News: BNCMC Launches School Awareness Drives To Mark 350th Martyrdom Year Of Guru Tegh...
Thane Crime: Ration Hoarding Racket Busted In Mumbra; Shop Sealed Over ₹3.84 Lakh Rice Scam
Thane Crime: Ration Hoarding Racket Busted In Mumbra; Shop Sealed Over ₹3.84 Lakh Rice Scam