Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Girlfriend In Cruelty Case, Rules She's Not a Relative Of Estranged Husband

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Girlfriend In Cruelty Case, Rules She's Not a Relative Of Estranged Husband

The court noted that the applicant (girlfriend) is not a relative of the husband and the only allegation against her is that she has an extramarital affair with the husband.

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Thursday, January 25, 2024, 10:11 PM IST
article-image
Bombay High Court | File

Mumbai: Observing that the girlfriend of an estranged husband is not a “relative”, the Bombay High Court has quashed an FIR against a woman who was roped in by the wife in a cruelty case under the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The court noted that the applicant (girlfriend) is not a relative of the husband and the only allegation against her is that she has an extramarital affair with the husband. It also alleged that the husband is pressuring her for divorce so that he can marry his girlfriend.

Background of the case

The couple married in July 2016. Following disputes, in December 2022, the wife filed an FIR with the Surgana Police Station in Nashik under section 498A (Husband or relative of husband of a woman subjecting her to cruelty), 406 (criminal breach of trust), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (Intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace), read with 34 (common intention) of the IPC. She alleged that her husband and his family members subjected her to physical and mental cruelty. She even named the girlfriend in the FIR.

Her advocates, Abhishek Kulkarni and Sagar Wakale submitted that the girlfriend is not a relative or family member of the husband. The allegations in the FIR are that the husband has an extramarital relationship with a woman which has led to frequent quarrels between the couple. The woman has alleged that her husband received messages from his girlfriend and that he intends to marry her, said Kulkarni.

Cruelty on husband's side: HC

The high court relied on a Supreme Court judgment which observed that “living with another woman may be an act of cruelty on the part of the husband for judicial separation or dissolution of marriage but the same would not attract the wrath of Section 498-A (cruelty) of the Penal Code” on the other woman.

“By no stretch of the imagination would a girlfriend or even a concubine in any etymological sense be a “relative”.. Such a status must be conferred either by blood or marriage or adoption. If no marriage has taken place, the question of one being relative of another would not arise,” the apex court had said.

While quashing the case against the girlfriend, the HC said that the allegations in the FIR, even if accepted in entirety, do not disclose any cognisable offence against the girlfriend. “In such circumstances, subjecting her to face criminal prosecution will be an abuse of process of law,” the bench added.

RECENT STORIES

Sharad Pawar-Led NCP Faction Gets ‘Man Blowing Turha’ Poll Symbol By EC; Party Welcomes Decision

Sharad Pawar-Led NCP Faction Gets ‘Man Blowing Turha’ Poll Symbol By EC; Party Welcomes Decision

Manohar Joshi: All You Need To Know About Bal Thackeray's Close Confidant

Manohar Joshi: All You Need To Know About Bal Thackeray's Close Confidant

Former Maharashtra CM Manohar Joshi Passes Away At 86

Former Maharashtra CM Manohar Joshi Passes Away At 86

FPJ Exclusive: Theatre Artist Mahek's Ascend From Kamathipura To Broadway

FPJ Exclusive: Theatre Artist Mahek's Ascend From Kamathipura To Broadway

Mumbai: 6,950 School Students Participate In CR's Drawing & Essay Competitions On Amrit Bharat...

Mumbai: 6,950 School Students Participate In CR's Drawing & Essay Competitions On Amrit Bharat...