Supreme Court: No waiver of fees to transgender as lawyers

The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a plea for waiver of the registration/enrollment fees for transgenders as lawyers by the statutory Bar bodies for enrollment, holding that such issues do not fall under the parameters of the judicial review.

FPJ BureauUpdated: Saturday, December 03, 2022, 01:23 AM IST
article-image
Supreme Court of India | File

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday refused to entertain a plea for waiver of the registration/enrollment fees for transgenders as lawyers by the statutory Bar bodies for enrollment, holding that such issues do not fall under the parameters of the judicial review.

A bench comprising Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justice P S Narasimha said that the parameters of judicial review did not allow constitutional courts to pass orders such as waiver of enrolment fees.

“You cannot say that you do not charge an enrollment fee. Why just transgender persons, why not extend this to women, disabled and marginalised persons,” the CJI asked. “You must understand the parameters of judicial review.” The bench asked why only in the legal profession, such fee waiver should be extended to the medical field also, and said it would dismiss the plea.

The counsel for petitioner M Karpagam then decided to withdraw the petition.

The top court permitted Karpagam to give a representation to this effect to the Bar Council of India, the apex statutory body of lawyers.

(If you have a story in and around Mumbai, you have our ears, be a citizen journalist and send us your story here. )

(To receive our E-paper on WhatsApp daily, please click here.  To receive it on Telegram, please click here. We permit sharing of the paper's PDF on WhatsApp and other social media platforms.)

RECENT STORIES

Mumbai: HC allows TV actor to take child abroad for 3 days

Mumbai: HC allows TV actor to take child abroad for 3 days

Bombay HC quashes ASI order to demolish controversial bungalow in Old Goa heritage zone

Bombay HC quashes ASI order to demolish controversial bungalow in Old Goa heritage zone

Age of Consent debate & POTA law in India

Age of Consent debate & POTA law in India

50% High Court judges from district judiciary: SC seeks response from Centre, Delhi HC

50% High Court judges from district judiciary: SC seeks response from Centre, Delhi HC

Maharashtra's border dispute with Karnataka stuck as SC Judge recuses

Maharashtra's border dispute with Karnataka stuck as SC Judge recuses