Mumbai: Acquitting auto driver, court says commuters should be cautious

Mumbai: Acquitting auto driver, court says commuters should be cautious

Staff ReporterUpdated: Sunday, May 01, 2022, 08:22 PM IST
article-image
Pixabay

A magistrate court in Vikhroli acquitted an auto driver of rash driving leading to grievous injury to the leg of a young boy commuting in a share auto from the opposite side with his family. It stated in its order that his aunt who was commuting with him did not take enough care to see that his leg was not out of the share-auto and that such carelessness led to the accident.

The child was sitting on the lap of his cousin sister, who’s mother was also commuting in the vehicle and had lodged the complaint. Another sibling as also commuting in the share auto that was headed from Naidu Colony in Pant Nagar to Ghatkopar railway station. The boy’s aunt Rekha Jadhav had complained that the auto that came from the opposite side was driven rashly, hit their auto and injured the right leg of her nephew. The auto’s driver Bhagwan Bhambure had been charged under Sec 279 (rash driving) and Sec 338 (negligent act leading to grievous hurt) of the IPC.

The court noted that the child must have been sitting on the right side of the auto where it is mandatory to fix such a rod for safety. “Still if a vehicle from the opposite side vehicle has hit, it means to some extent his leg would have been out of the auto,” it observed, adding that witnesses have stated in their cross-examination that the road from the colony to the station is crowded.

It considered the road being crowded and the vehicle being a share-auto, and said that the complainant and witnesses were seated in a haphazard manner. Metropolitan Magistrate VK Umale said in the order that in a city like Mumbai, auto commuters should take care of their own safety and sit carefully.

The court noted that while the complainant has claimed that the accused’s auto had hit theirs from the opposite side, neither of the vehicles were damaged nor were other commuters injured.

Magistrate Umale held that the complainant and other witnesses, including their auto-driver and the child’s cousins, had not taken care of all situations when the vehicle was moving and that out of carelessness, had let the young boy’s leg be out of the auto, due to which the accident took place and he got injured.

RECENT STORIES

Bombay HC Refuses Interim Relief To Filmmaker Ramesh Sippy In Family Assets Case

Bombay HC Refuses Interim Relief To Filmmaker Ramesh Sippy In Family Assets Case

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...