FPJ Legal: Court says Avantha Group promoter Gautam Thapar can influence witnesses in loan fraud case

FPJ Legal: Court says Avantha Group promoter Gautam Thapar can influence witnesses in loan fraud case

Staff ReporterUpdated: Thursday, December 23, 2021, 09:10 AM IST
article-image
Gautam Thapar | File

A special court that, on Tuesday, rejected the bail plea of Avantha Group promoter and businessman Gautam Thapar in a loan fraud case concerning Yes Bank, has said in its detailed order that there is a possibility of him influencing witnesses, some of whom are his employees.

The case pertains to a loss of Rs 1,800 crore to the bank caused by the Avantha Group.

The bank’s then MD and CEO Rana Kapoor is said to have obtained a prime property in Delhi on Amrita Shergill Marg for extending concessions and waivers to the group in credit facilities already availed by it, as also for extending further credit facilities. Kapoor’s wife Bindu Kapoor is also a co-accused in the case. She was the director of the firm which purchased the bungalow belonging to the group that had been mortgaged to Yes Bank at much below the market price.

Special Judge MR Purwar said in his order that from the chargesheet and connected papers, prima facie the allegations are that he and his co-accused committed offence which resulted in serious dent to the financial health of state. Judge Purwar further said that prima facie the allegations are sufficient to show his complicity and the court is not inclined to grant relief in the larger interest of society.

RECENT STORIES

Bombay HC Refuses Interim Relief To Filmmaker Ramesh Sippy In Family Assets Case

Bombay HC Refuses Interim Relief To Filmmaker Ramesh Sippy In Family Assets Case

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...