FPJ Legal | Bombay HC seeks reply of striking employees’ on MSRTC’s contempt plea

FPJ Legal | Bombay HC seeks reply of striking employees’ on MSRTC’s contempt plea

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Wednesday, November 10, 2021, 10:53 PM IST
article-image
File photo

The Bombay high court on Wednesday sought a reply from striking MSRTC employees on a contempt petition filed by the transport body, stating that the employees had “wilfully breached” court orders which had restrained them from going on strike from the midnight of November 3-4.

The transport corporation has added the workers’ union – the Maharashtra Rajya Kanishth Vetanshreni led by Ajaykumar Gajjar and 340 employees as respondents to the contempt petition.

A vacation bench of Justices S J Kathawalla and Abhay Ahuja has directed the respondents to file their reply by November 12 and kept the petition for hearing on November 15.

On November 3, the HC had, in an urgent hearing, directed the employees to refrain from proceeding with the rallies/strikes or stoppage of work till further orders, to save commuters from hardship during Diwali.

However, more than 98,000 employees went on strike and 250 depots are non-functional.

Meanwhile, after suspending 376 employees on Tuesday, the MSRTC suspended 542 more employees on Wednesday, taking the total number to 914 suspensions.

During the hearing on November 8, the advocate for the workers’ union assured the court that if the government were to set up a committee to look into their demands, they would withdraw the strike. Accordingly, as per HC directions, the government constituted a three-member committee to look into their demand of considering MSRTC workers as government employees.

However, during the hearing later that day, the employees’ advocate, Gunaratan Sadavarte, said that the workers had refused to withdraw the strike, following which the HC had asked the MSRTC to initiate contempt proceedings against them.

“We do not understand why the employees of MSRTC have now backed out from what they themselves wanted the government to consider. Despite them having repeatedly breached the orders passed by this court, the court, when informed that some of the employees of MSRTC had committed suicide, as stated earlier, kept the issue of breach of our orders aside and requested the state government to consider the demands of the employees of the MSRTC,” the HC noted in its order.

The MSRTC’s contempt petition states that despite refrain orders from the HC and the Industrial Court, the employees deliberately went on strike and “have also resiled from withdrawing their strike” despite formation of the committee as per their demands. Hence, the “contemnors be dealt with accordance with the provisions of contempt of courts act,” the petition seeks.

MSRTC counsel GS Hegde told the court the striking employees had blocked the entrance of thedepots and were not allowing other employees to attend duty.

It has also prayed that pending hearing in the petition, the MSRTC has sought that the striking employees be restrained from “gathering/assembling and/or holding any dharnas/sit-in within 500 metres from the respective depot/office”.

The MSRTC also sought direction to respondents “to purge the contempt by reporting to work at concerned depots and refrain from obstructing other employees from working and to withdraw the strike.”

The petition states that the transport corporation “ferries 7 million passengers daily on 13,700 routes through around 16, 500 buses and serves routes to towns and cities within Maharashtra and adjoining states”. Considering the large network of the corporation, the services rendered by it are indispensable, the petition said.

RECENT STORIES

Bombay HC Refuses Interim Relief To Filmmaker Ramesh Sippy In Family Assets Case

Bombay HC Refuses Interim Relief To Filmmaker Ramesh Sippy In Family Assets Case

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Mumbai: POCSO Court Sentences 2 Men To 10 Years In Prison For Eve-Teasing & Sexual Harassment Of...

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Upholds ₹3 Crore Compensation & Monthly Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Bombay High Court Questions Panvel Municipal Corporation's Retroactive Property Tax Demand

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...

Residents Cannot Be Penalised For Authorities' Delay In Executing Public Amenities Works: Bombay...