SC to hear petitions challenging ED chief's tenure extension on March 21

SC to hear petitions challenging ED chief's tenure extension on March 21

A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Aravind Kumar deferred the matter, noting that it needs a detailed hearing.

FPJ BureauUpdated: Monday, February 27, 2023, 06:58 PM IST
article-image
Supreme Court | PTI

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday fixed a hearing on March 21 on the petitions challenging the tenure extension of the Enforcement Director up to five years by amending the law.

A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Aravind Kumar deferred the matter, noting that it needs a detailed hearing.

๐—ฃ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฐ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€: ๐—ฆ๐—š

As the hearing commenced, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta submitted that an affidavit has been filed by the Centre, stating that the petitions have been filed by the interest parties, by such leaders against whom the ED cases are pending for money laundering.

"All political people facing serious money laundering cases have come before this court," he submitted.

To this, the top court remarked: "We are not concerned with that."

๐—˜๐˜…๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐˜† ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€: ๐—”๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—–๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—ฒ

Senior advocate KV Vishwanathan, who has been appointed as a amicus curiae (court's friend) in the case, said extensions may only be granted in exceptional cases.

In a significant development in the petitions challenging the third extension given to ED Director SK Mishra, the amicus curiae in the matter, senior advocate K V Viswanathan told the court that the extensions were illegal.

๐—”๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐˜†๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—น๐˜† ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€, ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿญ ๐—–๐—ฉ๐—– ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—น

Not only the extensions but also the 2021 amendment to the Central Vigilance Commission Act 2003 enabling the tenure extension of the ED up to five years is illegal, opined the amicus.

"The extension order and the statutory amendments, keeping in mind the long line of judgments from Vineet Narain, Prakash Singh 1 and Prakash Singh II, Common Cause I and 2 are illegal. Not only the extensions, but also the amendments," Viswanathan told the Bench.

๐—ฆ๐—– ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฑ ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜€๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ'๐˜€ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฒ

The top court had on December 12 sought the response from the Centre and others to a plea challenging the third extension granted to Envorcement Directorate chief Sanjay Kumar Mishra. One of the petitions is Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jaya Thakur.

She accused the Centre of destroying the "basic structure" of democracy by misusing the enforcement agencies against its political opponents.

The petitioner referred to a specific order passed by the Supreme Court that no further extension be granted to Mishra, but the Centre gave him the second extension from November 17, 2021 to November 17, 2022 and during the pendency of her writ petition, Mishra was again given third extension from November 18, 2022 to November 18, 2023, showing no respect towards the rule of law.

On November 18, Justice S K Kaul had recused himself from hearing the pleas challenging the law amended to all extension of up to five years to the ED director, a day after mishra was given a fresh one-year extension as the chief of the anti-money laundering agency.

๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€, ๐—ง๐— ๐—– ๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ต๐˜ ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜„

Mishra, 62, was first appointed the director of the ED for two years on November 19,2018 and later his term was changed to three years. The government promoted an ordinance last year to extend the tenure of ED and CBI chiefs by up to three years after the mandated term of two eyars.

Congress leader Randeep Singh Surjewala challenged the amendment made by the Centre in contradiction of two Apex Court judgments in the Vineet Narayan and the Common Cause cases on fixed tenure of such officials. Other petitioners are Trinamool Congress leader Mahua Moitra and Saket Gokhale.

RECENT STORIES

Setback For Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh: Delhi Court Frames Sexual Harassment Charges Against Former...

Setback For Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh: Delhi Court Frames Sexual Harassment Charges Against Former...

Unnao Seat, Uttar Pradesh Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Schedule, Key Fights & Previous Resultsย 

Unnao Seat, Uttar Pradesh Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Schedule, Key Fights & Previous Resultsย 

From Not Visiting CM Office To Not Signing Official Files: Supreme Court's 5 Conditions For Arvind...

From Not Visiting CM Office To Not Signing Official Files: Supreme Court's 5 Conditions For Arvind...

SC Grants Bail To Controversial Ex-Cop Pradeep Sharma In Lakhan Bhaiya Encounter Case

SC Grants Bail To Controversial Ex-Cop Pradeep Sharma In Lakhan Bhaiya Encounter Case

Karnataka Horror! Kodagu Man Chops Off Minor Fianceeโ€™s Head In Front Of Her Parents For Calling...

Karnataka Horror! Kodagu Man Chops Off Minor Fianceeโ€™s Head In Front Of Her Parents For Calling...