Chandigarh: High Court grants bail to Akali leader Bikram Singh Majithia in drugs case

Majithia, a senior Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) leader and brother-in-law of former deputy chief minister Sukhbir Badal, was booked under the NDPS Act on December 20, 2021

Rajesh MoudgilUpdated: Wednesday, August 10, 2022, 07:14 PM IST
article-image
Akali leader and former minister Bikram Singh Majithia | Photo: PTI

The Punjab and Haryana High Court Wednesday granted regular bail to senior Akali leader and former minister Bikram Singh Majithia in the 2021 drugs-related case.

The order was passed by the high court bench of justice M S Ramachandra Rao and justice Sureshwar Thakur. The case was assigned to the bench on July 22, which reserved its orders after the July 29 hearing.

Earlier, a bench presided over by justice A G Masih and justice Sandeep Moudgil heard the matter, which was filed on May 23. However, on July 4, the day it was to pronounce the judgment, the bench recused itself from hearing it.

Majithia, a senior Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) leader and brother-in-law of former deputy chief minister Sukhbir Badal, was booked under the NDPS Act on December 20, 2021, by Punjab police, but was given protection from arrest by the Supreme Court before he surrendered on February 20 once the state assembly elections were over. He had also moved to the high court after the case was registered against him. He contested against senior Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu though both of them were drubbed by AAP candidate, a first-timer.

Majithia had contended in his petition that the then Congress government in the state misused its power and position for wreaking vengeance against its political opponents. He also held that the then Congress government was bent on falsely implicating the petitioner in a case.

The high court held that there was no material placed on record showing possession, transportation, storing by or recovery of any contraband from the petitioner and all recoveries in the concluded trials had been effected from specific individuals and the petitioner was not shown therein to have any role in that regard.

The high court also held that the state had not sought police remand of the petitioner after he surrendered before the special court and only sought judicial remand saying his custodial interrogation was not required.

The police on the other hand had also opposed the bail submitting that witnesses who had been examined expressed concern about their security if he was released on bail.

(To receive our E-paper on whatsapp daily, please click here. To receive it on Telegram, please click here. We permit sharing of the paper's PDF on WhatsApp and other social media platforms.)

RECENT STORIES

Amidst political crisis in Rajasthan, CM Ashok Gehlot requests people to give another chance

Amidst political crisis in Rajasthan, CM Ashok Gehlot requests people to give another chance

Telangana: Quota for Scheduled Tribe increases by 10 percent in education, govt jobs

Telangana: Quota for Scheduled Tribe increases by 10 percent in education, govt jobs

Congress presidential polls: Former Jharkhand minister KN Tripathi's nomination for top post...

Congress presidential polls: Former Jharkhand minister KN Tripathi's nomination for top post...

Delhi: PUC certificate must from October 25 for refuelling at petrol pumps

Delhi: PUC certificate must from October 25 for refuelling at petrol pumps

Female constable fell out of Telangana CM KCR's convoy, sustain minor injuries

Female constable fell out of Telangana CM KCR's convoy, sustain minor injuries