As part of proposing far reaching measures for improving corp governance in listed firms, the panel has recommended limiting chairmanship to non-executive directors, appointing at least one woman as independent director with number of board meetings to five per year.
New Delhi : Focused on evolutionary steps, the Uday Kotak panel report on corporate governance is not a “magic wand” that will cleanse functioning of listed companies overnight but provides for measures that will hold good for next generation of reforms, according to some committee members. As part of proposing far reaching measures for improving corporate governance at listed companies, the panel has recommended limiting chairmanship to non-executive directors, appointing at least one woman as independent director and increasing the number of board meetings to five in a year. The report of the committee, headed by noted banker Uday Kotak, which was submitted to markets regulator Sebi earlier this month has elicited mixed responses. Union minister Piyush Goyal had opined that the report has gone “completely off the mark” even as he opined that there are many things good as well as inappropriate in it.
According to four members who interacted with PTI, the committee adopted an approach of evolution rather than revolution even as they opined that the effort was to create the next generation of corporate governance and make companies future ready.
“This (report) is not an academic treatise on how a company should be governed, but is practical in outlook… the recommendations have largely been made with the longer-term outcomes in mind. This (report) is not a magic wand that will cleanse companies overnight,” Deloitte Haskins & Sells LLP Managing Partner and CEO N Venkatram said. KPMG in India’s Chairman and CEO Arun Kumar said the committee was driven by two guiding principles relating to governance at the board level – protection of the interests of minority shareholders and long-term value creation for all shareholders. “Corporate governance in India is like the proverbial curate’s egg; excellent in parts but whole there is room for improvement,” he said.
Among others, the committee has suggested that companies should be required to disclose the list of expertise that its board members actually possess. In recent times, there have been instances of alleged corporate governance lapses at some leading corporates. “We took it as our dharma to basically not be incrementalist and not just tweak things here and there but do things that will hold good for the next generation of reforms,” said Krishnamurthy Subramanian, Associate Professor of Finance & (Inaugural) Alumni Endowment Research Fellow, at Indian School of Business, Hyderabad. Subramanian, who is also the Executive Director, Centre for Analytical Finance at ISB, said the effort was to create the next generation of corporate governance and try to make a structural break.
“If we want consistent growth of 8 per cent or close to double digit growth apart from other reforms corporate governance has to shape up,” he added. The panel has also recommended that all companies with public holdings of more than 40 per cent would need to separate the roles of Chairman and CEO by 2020.
