New Delhi: Prashant Ruia-led Essar Steel Asia Holdings (ESAHL), the majority shareholder in Essar Steel, on Tuesday moved the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) seeking rejection of ArcelorMittal’s Rs 42,000 crore bid to acquire the bankrupt steelmaker, alleging that its promoter Lakshmi Mittal hid his association with loan defaulting firms run by his brothers. Seeking ArcelorMittal be declared ineligible to bid for Essar Steel, the petition cited Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) which bars promoters of defaulting companies from bidding for stressed assets.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) agreed to hear the plea by Essar Steel Asia Holdings Ltd (ESAHL) and asked ArcelorMittal to respond to the plea. It fixed May 13 as the next date of hearing. Essar Steel Asia Holdings Ltd (ESAHL) holds 72 pc shares of Essar Steel. The plea comes weeks after an insolvency court cleared ArcelorMittal’s bid for Essar Steel, which was auctioned by lenders to recover unpaid loans. It alleged that Mittal was a promoter of GPI Textiles Ltd, Balasore Alloys Ltd and Gontermann Piepers (India) Ltd – firms run by his brothers Pramod and Vinod Mittal that have been classified as bad loans.
Appearing for ESAHL, senior counsel Mukul Rohatgi said, “grossest violation was suppressed by Arcelor before CoC, NCLT, NCLAT and Supreme Court.” IBC rules had previously compelled Mittal to shell out an extra Rs 7,000 crore to clear bank dues of Uttam Galva Steels and KSS Petron where he held some stake and reportedly sold his holdings in one of them for Re 1 a share. Reacting to the development, ArcelorMittal said, “This is the latest in a long line of frivolous attempts by the defaulting promoters of Essar Steel to distract from the central fact that Indian lenders have declared ArcelorMittal as the most credible owner of Essar Steel.”
“The latest allegations of the Essar Steel promoters are yet another attempt to subvert the directions of the Supreme Court and the IBC, critical government legislation. Their assertions are irrelevant, misleading and will be rebutted in the strongest possible terms,” it said in a statement. ArcelorMittal has stated on numerous occasions that there is absolutely no business connection between Lakshmi Mittal and his brothers, the company said. The petition by ESAHL alleged that while ArcelorMittal paid debts of Uttam Galva Steels and KSS Petron, it “suppressed and concealed from the Committee of (Essar Steel) Creditors and all courts” about NPA debts of three other companies.
