Bombay HC Urges Amicable Resolution In Aditya Dhar Defamation Suit Over ‘Dhurandhar 2’ Script Row

Bombay HC Urges Amicable Resolution In Aditya Dhar Defamation Suit Over ‘Dhurandhar 2’ Script Row

The Bombay High Court advised an amicable resolution in Aditya Dhar’s defamation suit against Santosh Kumar over alleged script plagiarism. The court said the dispute should not escalate and urged both sides to pursue proper legal remedies instead of public claims.

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Thursday, April 16, 2026, 09:12 PM IST
article-image
Bombay High Court suggests resolving the Aditya Dhar defamation dispute amicably instead of escalating the legal battle | File Photo

Mumbai, April 16: The Bombay High Court on Thursday indicated that the defamation suit filed by writer-director of “Dhurandhar 2 – The Revenge” Aditya Dhar against writer-filmmaker Santosh Kumar over the film’s script should not be allowed to escalate. Justice Arif Doctor urged both sides to resolve the dispute amicably.

Court suggests amicable resolution

“A matter like this should be resolved. It doesn’t need to escalate into a fight for defamation,” the judge observed, adding that the issue appeared capable of being de-escalated and worked out.

Allegations and response

Dhar has sued Kumar after the latter publicly alleged that the film’s script was plagiarised from his own work, claiming he had written a similar script earlier. Dhar has denied the allegations, calling them defamatory.

Court advises legal recourse

The Court pointed out that if Kumar believed his work had been copied, he was free to pursue appropriate civil remedies rather than making claims in the media.

Kumar’s advocate clarified that his client’s grievance was limited to asserting authorship of the story. The Court assured that Kumar was entitled to make such a claim, but stressed that it should be done through proper legal channels.

Arguments from both sides

Senior Advocate Birendra Saraf, appearing for Dhar, submitted that any such claim must be pursued legally and not repeated publicly. Kumar’s counsel said he would seek instructions on this suggestion.

Next hearing scheduled

The Court also noted that it hoped to bring the dispute to a close at the next hearing.

Dhar had moved the High Court seeking an injunction and damages after Kumar allegedly failed to respond to a legal notice denying plagiarism claims. Earlier, on April 8, the Court had restrained Kumar from repeating the allegedly defamatory statements.

Also Watch:

According to the suit, Kumar claimed that the script was copied from his work ‘D Saheb’. Dhar has denied the allegations, maintaining that they are baseless and have caused serious harm to his professional reputation. The matter has been posted for further hearing on April 30.

To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/