Bombay HC Grants Bail To 28-Year-Old Man In POCSO Case, Cites Discrepancies In Victim's Testimony

Bombay HC Grants Bail To 28-Year-Old Man In POCSO Case, Cites Discrepancies In Victim's Testimony

Justice Milind Jadhav, while granting bail, expressed strong reservations about the prosecution's handling of the matter, highlighting inconsistencies between the initial FIR and the victim’s testimony before the court. In her testimony, the victim denied that the man took her obscene photographs, as alleged by the prosecution.

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Sunday, March 30, 2025, 07:19 PM IST
article-image
Bombay HC | File Pic

The Bombay High Court has granted bail to a 28-year-old man accused in a Protection of Children From Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act case, citing significant discrepancies in the victim’s testimony and the prolonged delay in the trial. 

Justice Milind Jadhav, while granting bail, expressed strong reservations about the prosecution's handling of the matter, highlighting inconsistencies between the initial FIR and the victim’s testimony before the court. In her testimony, the victim denied that the man took her obscene photographs, as alleged by the prosecution. 

The man, arrested on May 11, 2021, faced serious charges, including rape, stalking, and criminal intimidation. His advocates,  Prashant Pandey and Dinesh Jadhwani, submitted that the applicant has been incarcerated for almost four years. 

Opposing the plea, the prosecution urged the court to, instead, expedite the trial, requesting a six-month deadline for completion.

Justice Jadhav, however, found significant discrepancies in the victim’s evidence. “Perusing the said evidence of the prosecutrix which is recorded when prima facie seen, the same is completely contrary to the statement recorded in the FIR,” he noted. The court also pointed out inconsistencies in the dates and details of the alleged incidents, and the victim’s denial of allegations concerning obscene photographs.

The court criticised the prosecution’s handling of the case, stating, “It is unfortunate to say that learned APP has not read the papers and the deposition of the prosecutrix in the present case, otherwise such submissions would not have been made before the Court.” 

Granting bail, Justice Jadhav ordered the applicant’s release on a personal bond of Rs25,000. Strict conditions were imposed, including regular reporting to the investigating officer, attendance at all trial hearings, and a prohibition on contacting the victim or entering her residential jurisdiction. The court warned that any violation of these conditions would lead to bail cancellation.

RECENT STORIES

Maharashtra Politics: Eknath Shinde’s Shiv Sena Forms Alliance With Anandraj Ambedkar’s...

Maharashtra Politics: Eknath Shinde’s Shiv Sena Forms Alliance With Anandraj Ambedkar’s...

Central Railway Celebrates 100 Years Of Iconic Stations With Grand Station Mahotsav At CSMT (See...

Central Railway Celebrates 100 Years Of Iconic Stations With Grand Station Mahotsav At CSMT (See...

CIDCO-Railway Stalemate Halts Navi Mumbai Station Redevelopment, Shiv Sena MP Threatens Stir

CIDCO-Railway Stalemate Halts Navi Mumbai Station Redevelopment, Shiv Sena MP Threatens Stir

Mumbai Ola-Uber Drivers’ Strike Enters Day 2; Commuters Hit Hard As Protest Grows Over Low Fares,...

Mumbai Ola-Uber Drivers’ Strike Enters Day 2; Commuters Hit Hard As Protest Grows Over Low Fares,...

Western Railway Extends Trips Of 6 Pairs Of Weekly Special Trains Until September 2025; Booking...

Western Railway Extends Trips Of 6 Pairs Of Weekly Special Trains Until September 2025; Booking...