Bombay HC Dismisses PIL Seeking Ban On Ministers Attending Religious Rituals, Calls It Waste Of Judicial Time

Bombay HC Dismisses PIL Seeking Ban On Ministers Attending Religious Rituals, Calls It Waste Of Judicial Time

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought to restrain state functionaries from attending religious rituals and performing bhoomi pooja. The court noted that the PIL was nothing but wastage of previous judicial time.

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Saturday, September 14, 2024, 02:53 AM IST
article-image
Bombay High Court | PTI

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought to restrain state functionaries from attending religious rituals and performing bhoomi pooja. The court noted that the PIL was nothing but wastage of previous judicial time.

The HC dismissed the PIL filed by a public trust Forum for Fast Justice and Bhagvanji Raiayni in 2020 urged the court to direct authorities to stop using public premises for installing any idol or picture of any deity, except those of the Father of the Nation, the President, or the Prime Minister, and to prohibit the performance of any pujas or similar rites.

The plea further sought a ban on ritualistic pujas, idol immersion, and the disposal of dead bodies in natural water bodies to prevent environmental hazards.

Raiayni, relied on newspaper reports, and sought that ministers should be stopped from leaving their offices during working hours for temple visits and religious rites, visiting voters' constituencies, and addressing election rallies during electioneering, as they are paid public servants.

The court, however, noted that the plea failed to make out any legal ground for relief except for making general assertions.

A bench of Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Amit Borkar said that the prayers in the PIL are omnibus in nature. “The PIL petition, in our opinion, does not make out any legal ground except for making general assertions and seeking a prayer that Court may advice the State to amend the Representation of People Act,” the judges added.

This petition, styled as PIL petition, made generalised statements and prayed for omnibus reliefs stating that the petitioners are anguished by “blatant defiance of the secular and democratic character of the provisions contained in the Indian Constitution”. It claimed that whatever be the personal faith or belief of a judge, he has to abide by the tenets of the constitution and the laws and that he should be possessed with skill of acumen and judicial courage of fearless judgments.

“The entire petition does not make out any legal ground for seeking the reliefs prayed therein,” the Hc said while dismissing the PIL. The judges underscored that it is expected on one hand to encourage the genuine causes being brought before it however, at the same time, attempts by filing such baseless petitions and petitions based on completely unsubstantiated legal grounds should be discouraged.

RECENT STORIES

Mumbai: DRI Arrests Opium Cultivator From Madhya Pradesh, Busts Smuggling Syndicate With 9.69 Kg...

Mumbai: DRI Arrests Opium Cultivator From Madhya Pradesh, Busts Smuggling Syndicate With 9.69 Kg...

Mumbai: Relief For 132 EWS Homebuyers As MHADA Blocks Extra Development Fees By Thane Developer

Mumbai: Relief For 132 EWS Homebuyers As MHADA Blocks Extra Development Fees By Thane Developer

Maharashtra: CGST Cracks Down On 70 Shell Companies In Palghar, Busting ₹48.08 Crore Bogus ITC...

Maharashtra: CGST Cracks Down On 70 Shell Companies In Palghar, Busting ₹48.08 Crore Bogus ITC...

Mumbai: 34% Water Loss Spurs BMC To Replace Ageing Pipelines Across City & Suburbs

Mumbai: 34% Water Loss Spurs BMC To Replace Ageing Pipelines Across City & Suburbs

Mumbai Metro: RML Expands WhatsApp-Based Ticketing In Partnership With PeLocal Fintech To Boost...

Mumbai Metro: RML Expands WhatsApp-Based Ticketing In Partnership With PeLocal Fintech To Boost...