Mumbai: Court rules that wandering streets late at night in absence of curfew not an offence

The police had claimed that Sumit Kashyap, hailing from Uttar Pradesh, tried to cover his face with a handkerchief while he was sitting on a road in south Mumbai. They had registered a case against him under Section 122 (b) of the Maharashtra Police Act

PTIUpdated: Monday, June 20, 2022, 11:29 AM IST
article-image
Representative Image | PTI

Mumbai: Wandering on a street late at night in a city like Mumbai when there is no night curfew is not an offence, a local court has said while acquitting a 29-year-old man booked by police for sitting on a road here under suspicious circumstances.

The city police had registered the case against the man on June 13 and the Girgaon metropolitan magistrate's court passed its order acquitting him on June 16.

The magistrate said on the basis of the evidence submitted by the prosecution, it was difficult for the court to hold that the accused was trying to hide his identity to commit an offence.

The police had claimed that the man, Sumit Kashyap, hailing from Uttar Pradesh, tried to cover his face with a handkerchief while he was sitting on a road in south Mumbai. They had registered the case against him under Section 122 (b) of the Maharashtra Police Act.

The section has provisions for booking a person found between sunrise and sunset for "having his face covered or otherwise disguised with intent to commit an offence".

Magistrate Nadeem Patel said, "The accused was arrested in Mumbai at around 1.30 am. In a city like Mumbai, 1.30 am is not too late. Anyone can stand on the road and therefore, it cannot be termed as hiding the identity with intent to commit an offence."

"Even if it is assumed that 1.30 am is too late, then also, wandering on the street is not an offence when there is no night curfew. Admittedly, there is no night curfew in Mumbai, therefore if the accused was standing on the road, it is not an offence," the court added.

The court refused to accept the police's case that the man was trying to hide his identity by covering his face with a handkerchief.

"It is the COVID-19 period and people are used to wearing mask for safety purposes. Though a mask is not compulsory, but there is an advisory to wear the mask. If anyone is not having a mask, then they use handkerchief as a mask, and if the accused is using the handkerchief as a mask to cover his mouth, it does not mean that he is hiding his identity," the court said.

The court, while acquitting Kashyap, said the prosecution had failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt the guilt of the accused.

(To receive our E-paper on whatsapp daily, please click here. To receive it on Telegram, please click here. We permit sharing of the paper's PDF on WhatsApp and other social media platforms.)

RECENT STORIES

Maharashtra political crisis: Harish Salve likely to represent Eknath Shinde group in SC

Maharashtra political crisis: Harish Salve likely to represent Eknath Shinde group in SC

State government forms committee for security of non-major ports in Maharashtra

State government forms committee for security of non-major ports in Maharashtra

Maharashtra political crisis: Mumbai Police gear up for return of rebel Shiv Sena MLAs

Maharashtra political crisis: Mumbai Police gear up for return of rebel Shiv Sena MLAs

Roorkee woman, 6-yr-old daughter gangraped in moving car: Police

Roorkee woman, 6-yr-old daughter gangraped in moving car: Police

Maharashtra political crisis: Harish Salve likely to represent Eknath Shinde group in SC tomorrow

Maharashtra political crisis: Harish Salve likely to represent Eknath Shinde group in SC tomorrow