New Delhi: The Bar Council of India (BCI) has approved the Rules of Legal Education, Moratorium (Three-Year Moratorium) 2025, which will remain in force for three years once published.
About The Moratorium
Under this moratorium, no new law colleges will be set up or granted approval anywhere in India. Existing institutions will also not be allowed to start new sections, courses, or batches without prior written permission from the BCI. Pending applications that have already reached the final stage of approval will not be affected and will continue to be processed as per the law.
The BCI said the move is aimed at stopping the decline in the quality of legal education caused by the rapid growth of sub-standard institutions, easy approvals without proper checks, commercialisation, academic malpractice, and lack of qualified faculty. With about 2,000 law colleges already in operation, the Council believes the focus should now be on improving quality rather than expansion.
The moratorium is backed by provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961 and follows earlier measures, including a similar pause in 2019 and court guidance in 2020. The Council has also urged state governments, universities, and other bodies not to forward proposals for new law colleges during this period.
Certain exceptions will apply, such as proposals meant exclusively for socially and educationally backwards classes, SC/ST communities, economically weaker sections, persons with disabilities, and institutions in remote or tribal areas. However, these will be allowed only if strict conditions are met, including proper government clearances, infrastructure, and faculty requirements.
During the moratorium, existing colleges will face stricter inspections and compliance audits. Violations could lead to withdrawal of BCI approval, derecognition of degrees, and legal action against institutions and officials involved.
The BCI will review the policy each year and may extend, modify, or repeal it depending on circumstances. The Council has called on all stakeholders to prioritise quality over quantity and uphold the highest standards in legal education.
(Except for the headline, this article has not been edited by FPJ's editorial team and is auto-generated from an agency feed.)
