Karnataka HC permits Xiaomi India to take overdrafts, make payments

Karnataka HC permits Xiaomi India to take overdrafts, make payments

The court has excluded the payment of technology royalty

AgenciesUpdated: Friday, May 13, 2022, 02:03 PM IST
article-image
Vacation Judge Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav on Thursday also extended the interim order till May 23 and stated that the matter is now between the banks and the petitioner company. /Karnataka HC | Photo: Representative Image

In a major relief to Xiaomi India, the Karnataka High Court has permitted it to take overdrafts from banks and make payments. However, the court has excluded the payment of technology royalty.

Vacation Judge Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav on Thursday also extended the interim order till May 23 and stated that the matter is now between the banks and the petitioner company.

The court had given conditional stay on the order given by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on April 29 to seize a whopping Rs 5,513.3 crore amount. The ED has taken the step after invoking the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999.

Senior advocate S Ganeshan argued that Xiaomi India was being targeted as it is a Chinese company and other companies are allowed to make payments of technology royalty. Seeking clarification on the earlier interim order on May 5, he argued that banks are not allowing Xiaomi to make remittances in foreign exchange for imports following the court order.

He explained that the company is required to make payments for foreign companies in connection with manufacturing and marketing smartphones.

Contesting this Additional Solicitor General M.B. Nargund said that the authorities have no complaints if Xiaomi is agreeable to keep the seized amount in the bank and use the remaining amount.

He brought to the notice of the court that on April 24 and 29, before the ED passed the order to seize Xiaomi's bank accounts, there was a transfer of around Rs 1,500 crore from the company's bank accounts as per the available information.

However, Xiaomi is maintaining that royalty payments made to three companies abroad would not violate the FEMA Act. The company further maintained that the I-T department itself had allowed it as a value added activity.

(With IANS inputs)

RECENT STORIES

Bridging The Gap: How Technology Transforms Regulatory Compliance In Finance

Bridging The Gap: How Technology Transforms Regulatory Compliance In Finance

Mastering Network Operations: A Deep Dive Into Professional Growth In The Tech Sector

Mastering Network Operations: A Deep Dive Into Professional Growth In The Tech Sector

Mumbai: Sustainable Housing Gives Real Estate Sector A Boost In MMR

Mumbai: Sustainable Housing Gives Real Estate Sector A Boost In MMR

Divorce Disputes Spill Over To Board Room: Nawaz Modi Alleges Gautam Singhania; Uses Personal...

Divorce Disputes Spill Over To Board Room: Nawaz Modi Alleges Gautam Singhania; Uses Personal...

Meta Shares Crash Over 10% As Anxiety Over Success Of AI Surges

Meta Shares Crash Over 10% As Anxiety Over Success Of AI Surges