Bombay High Court Grants Interim Stay On ₹2,500 Crore GST Demand Against Hindustan Coco-Cola Beverages

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Stay On ₹2,500 Crore GST Demand Against Hindustan Coco-Cola Beverages

Distributors first extended discounts to retailers, and Coca-Cola later adjusted its own discounts to the distributors based on these past transactions, a practice the revenue department said was intended to evade tax.

PTIUpdated: Friday, April 04, 2025, 10:59 PM IST
article-image
Hindustan Coco-cola Beverages |

Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has granted an interim stay on a GST demand of approximately Rs 2,500 crore against Hindustan Coca-ColaBeverages Private Limited noting the revenue department's interpretation of the provisions appeared "prima facie incorrect".

The show cause notice was issued in January based on findings that the company undervalued goods over seven assessment years by offering retrospective discounts to distributors.

As per the authorities, the discounts were structured in a way that reduced the taxable value of the supplies.

Distributors first extended discounts to retailers, and Coca-Cola later adjusted its own discounts to the distributors based on these past transactions, a practice the revenue department said was intended to evade tax.

The company challenged the notice in HC.

A bench of Justices BP Colabawalla and Firdosh Pooniwalla on April 1 said the reasoning adopted by the tax department was "prima facie incorrect".

The bench granted an interim injunction on the demand notice and restrained any coercive action against the company.

"We find that a strong prima facie case is made out for staying the effect and implementation of the impugned order. We say this because, we do not find at least prima facie that the reasoning employed by the 3rd Respondent (CGST Commissioner) is correct," the order said.

The court said it would hear the plea further on April 29.

The dispute lies in the interpretation of Section 15(3)(a) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act.

While the revenue department relied on this section to disallow the discounts, Coca-Cola argued that its pricing mechanism was fully compliant with Section 15(1), which says the transaction value forms the basis of taxable value.

The company claimed that all discounts were transparently recorded in its Distributor Management System and were not tools of evasion.

(Except for the headline, this article has not been edited by FPJ's editorial team and is auto-generated from an agency feed.)

RECENT STORIES

Lakshadweep Investors’ Meet Attracts Over ₹500 Cr Proposals, Boosting Blue Economy In Fisheries,...

Lakshadweep Investors’ Meet Attracts Over ₹500 Cr Proposals, Boosting Blue Economy In Fisheries,...

Gold, Silver Outlook: Bullish Trend Intact Despite Profit Booking, Say Experts

Gold, Silver Outlook: Bullish Trend Intact Despite Profit Booking, Say Experts

8th Pay Commission Raises Big Question On Pensioners DA, Government Breaks Silence On Viral Claim

8th Pay Commission Raises Big Question On Pensioners DA, Government Breaks Silence On Viral Claim

IPO Market Stays Busy Next Week, KSH International Leads Four New Issues As 15 Stocks Set To List

IPO Market Stays Busy Next Week, KSH International Leads Four New Issues As 15 Stocks Set To List

Godrej Properties Logs ₹2,600-Crore Sales In Debut Year At Hyderabad, Gears Up to Scale Presence...

Godrej Properties Logs ₹2,600-Crore Sales In Debut Year At Hyderabad, Gears Up to Scale Presence...