Bombay High Court Upholds Society's Right To Recover Long-Pending Maintenance Dues
The Bombay High Court upheld a cooperative housing society’s right to recover long-pending maintenance dues from flat occupants, ruling such dues are recurring liabilities not barred by limitation. The court dismissed a petition by two elderly occupants without registered ownership, stating occupants enjoying benefits are liable for payments under special recovery provisions.

Bombay High Court Upholds Society's Right To Recover Long-Pending Maintenance Dues | Representational Image
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court, on Friday, upheld the right of a cooperative housing society to recover long-pending maintenance and service charges from flat occupants, ruling that such dues are a “recurring and continuing” liability and are not barred by limitation merely due to passage of time.
Petition Dismissed
Justice Amit Borkar dismissed a petition filed by two elderly brothers – Aspandiar Rashid Irani, 96, and Gustad Rashid Irani, 86 – who had challenged recovery proceedings initiated by Pasayadan Cooperative Housing Society, Thane. The petitioners had entered into an unregistered development agreement in 1996 with a developer, under which they received possession of four flats as consideration.
Though they occupied the flats since 2007, they were never formally admitted as members of the society. In 2023, the society raised a demand for arrears of maintenance from 2005, followed by recovery proceedings under Section 154B29 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act).
ALSO READ
The petitioners argued that the recovery was barred by limitation, that they were not members or flat owners due to absence of a registered agreement under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act (MOFA), and that prior to the 2019 amendment to the MCS Act, recovery proceedings could not be initiated against nonmembers.
Justice Borkar held that Section 154B-29 provides a special and overriding mechanism for recovery of society dues and does not prescribe any period of limitation. “When the legislature creates a special right and provides a special remedy with finality, the normal law of limitation does not automatically apply,” the court said.
On the issue of ownership, the court held that even in the absence of a registered agreement, persons who occupy flats, pay taxes and enjoy benefits of the society can be made liable for dues. If the petitioners acted as promoters under MOFA, they could not avoid their statutory responsibilities, the court ruled.
To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/
RECENT STORIES
-
Eight US States Sue OpenAI, Say ChatGPT Is 'Hurting Kids' & Misleading Parents -
YouTube Music Begins Labelling AI-Generated Songs, Plans Expansion To Main Platform Amid... -
'Starlink Has No Right To Operate In India' Swadeshi Jagaran Manch Leader Satish Kumar Says At... -
Bhopal Drug Bust As DRI Seizes ₹2.08 Crore Worth Of Suspected Methamphetamine Hidden In Woman's... -
PM Narendra Modi To Meet Asian Games 2026 Contingent Today After India Secures 85 Medals, Including...
