Bombay HC: Public Authorities Need Not Collect Private Information To Answer RTI Queries
The Bombay High Court has ruled that public authorities need not collect information from private entities merely to answer RTI applications. The court quashed CIC orders directing SEBI to obtain information from BSE, holding that the RTI Act requires authorities to provide information already held by them.

The Bombay High Court has ruled that RTI applicants cannot require public authorities to gather information from private entities | AI Generated Representational Image
Mumbai, August 19, 2026: The Bombay High Court has held that public authorities are not required under the Right to Information Act, 2005, to collect information from private entities merely because an RTI applicant has sought it.
A Bench of Justices Manish Pitale and Shreeram Shirsat made the observation while setting aside orders of the Central Information Commission (CIC) directing the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to obtain information from the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and provide it to RTI applicants.
SEBI and BSE had challenged the CIC’s directions before the High Court.
CIC Interpretation Rejected
The CIC had interpreted the term “information” under the RTI Act to mean that SEBI was required not only to disclose information already available in its records but also to obtain information from third parties such as BSE to answer RTI queries.
The High Court rejected this interpretation, holding that the fact that SEBI has regulatory powers to seek information from entities such as BSE does not mean that it has a corresponding obligation to gather such information for RTI applicants.
“The provisions (of the RTI Act) do not indicate that a public authority, like SEBI in the present case, which is a regulatory body empowered to call upon third parties to provide information in terms of its own governing statute, is under an obligation to obtain information from third parties to satisfy persons applying for such information,” the court said.
RTI Covers Information Already Held
The bench noted that the RTI Act requires a public authority to provide information that is already held by it. It does not require the authority to act as an information-gathering agency by collecting or compiling material that it does not possess.
SEBI had argued that requiring it to obtain information from third parties would go beyond the duties imposed on public authorities under the RTI Act.
The High Court found merit in the argument and referred to earlier Supreme Court rulings which have clarified that the RTI Act does not oblige public authorities to collect or collate information that is not already available with them.
Also Watch:
CIC Orders Quashed
The bench held that the CIC’s reasoning was contrary to the law laid down by the Supreme Court.
“We find that the said reasoning of the CIC is in the teeth of the position of law clarified by the Supreme Court and therefore, it cannot be sustained and the impugned orders deserve to be quashed and set aside,” the court said.
The High Court accordingly quashed the CIC orders challenged by SEBI and BSE.
To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/
RECENT STORIES
-
EC Revises Maharashtra SIR Schedule; Final Electoral Roll Deferred To November 4 -
MBPA Commissions 3 Fire Tenders, Dewatering Pump At Victoria Docks -
Bombay HC: Public Authorities Need Not Collect Private Information To Answer RTI Queries -
Massive Cyber Fraud Syndicate Uncovered Police; Multi-Crore Money Mule Network Exposed -
Mumbai Food Safety: FDA Suspends Licences Of 3 Establishments In Malad, Kurla And Kharghar Over...
