Bombay HC Reserves Verdict On Rahul Gandhi’s Plea To Quash Defamation Case Over PM Modi Remarks

Mumbai, Feb 24: The Bombay High Court on Tuesday reserved its verdict on a plea filed by Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi seeking quashing of criminal defamation proceedings initiated against him over alleged remarks concerning Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Justice NR Borkar reserved judgment after hearing detailed arguments from both sides while continuing interim protection granted to Gandhi.

Defamation complaint filed in 2019

A complaint was filed in 2019 by Mahesh Hukumchand Shrishrimal, a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party, alleging that Gandhi made defamatory statements during a political rally in Rajasthan in September 2018. The complainant claimed that the remarks led to trolling and reputational harm to the Prime Minister across media and social media platforms.

Acting on the complaint, the Girgaon Metropolitan Magistrate on August 28, 2019 issued process against Gandhi, directing him to appear before the court. Gandhi challenged the summons before the High Court after receiving it in July 2021, contending that the complaint was politically motivated and legally untenable.

Arguments on locus standi and CrPC provisions

Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola, appearing for Gandhi, argued that the complaint was barred under Section 199(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which mandates that alleged defamation of a public servant in relation to official functions can only be prosecuted upon a complaint by the competent authority before a sessions court. He further submitted that Gandhi had neither named the BJP nor targeted any identifiable or definite class, and therefore the complainant lacked locus standi (legal right of an individual to file a case).

Pasbola argued that a political party cannot be treated as a determinate class capable of maintaining a defamation complaint in a representative capacity.

Also Watch:

Opposing the plea, Advocate General Milind Sathe argued that the magistrate had found a prima facie case after examining evidence and that a party worker could qualify as an “aggrieved person” if defamatory remarks concerned an identifiable group.

To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/