BCI Bars Enrolment Of 2026 NALSAR Graduates After Students Protest CJI Surya Kant Invitation
BCI chairperson Manan Kumar Mishra said no 2026 NALSAR graduate should be enrolled as an advocate until further instructions are issued. The council has also sought a detailed, authenticated report from the university identifying students and others who allegedly played a leading role in organising or coordinating the campaign.
Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant | Representative Image
The Bar Council of India (BCI) has directed all State Bar Councils to withhold the enrolment of students graduating from Hyderabad’s NALSAR University of Law in 2026 until further orders, following a controversy over students’ opposition to an invitation extended to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant for the university’s convocation.
BCI seeks report from NALSAR
BCI chairperson Manan Kumar Mishra said no 2026 NALSAR graduate should be enrolled as an advocate until further instructions are issued. The council has also sought a detailed, authenticated report from the university identifying students and others who allegedly played a leading role in organising or coordinating the campaign.
Students opposed CJI invitation
The controversy began after a group of graduating students reportedly urged NALSAR authorities to reconsider inviting Justice Surya Kant as the convocation’s chief guest. Their objection was linked to remarks made by the Chief Justice during a July 22 Supreme Court hearing concerning alleged police action against protesters at Delhi’s Jantar Mantar.
During the hearing, a lawyer seeking urgent listing of a petition alleging police excesses against protesters said video evidence was available. The bench headed by Justice Surya Kant reportedly responded, “don’t waste our time and yours” and “we don’t want to watch any videos”, triggering criticism.
BCI seeks student details
The BCI has asked NALSAR to submit copies of representations, petitions and other communications related to the invitation, along with the names of signatories.
Mishra also alleged that some members of the university’s academic staff were involved in “misleading, instigating and misguiding” students, and claimed there was groupism and internal political activity among some faculty members.
BCI cites regulatory role
The BCI said it could not remain a “mute spectator” as the regulator of legal education.
RECENT STORIES
-
Bhiwandi Car Fire: Unidentified Man Suspected Of Setting Parked WagonR Ablaze Near Fish Chowk; CCTV... -
Panvel Municipal Corporation To Arrange Chhath Puja Facilities At 22 Locations On November 15 And 16 -
Diwali 2026: Mumbai Records Over 9,500 Two-Wheeler Registrations In First 10 Days Of November As... -
'One Of The Hardest Decisions': Mauricio Pochettino Breaks Down In Tears As He Confirms Manchester... -
Mumbai Court Convicts Wadala Couple For Derogatory Slogans Against Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar, Awards...
