NEET 2024: From Pre-Exam Paper Leak Rumours To Result Controversy and Supreme Court's Final Judgment, Complete Timeline

Today, the Supreme Court, delivered a detailed judgment explaining its decision not to cancel the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET)-UG, despite the controversies. Key Takeaways from the Court Order....Read more

Add FPJ As a
Trusted Source
NEET 2024: From Pre-Exam Paper Leak Rumours To Result Controversy and Supreme Court's Final Judgment, Complete Timeline
Siksha M Updated: Friday, August 02, 2024, 04:26 PM IST
NEET 2024: From Pre-Exam Paper Leak Rumours To Result Controversy and Supreme Court's Final Judgment, Complete Timeline

FPJ

Today, the Supreme Court, delivered a detailed judgment explaining its decision not to cancel the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test (NEET)-UG, despite the controversies. The court stressed on the need for the National Testing Agency (NTA) to address operational inconsistencies and secure the examination process more rigorously.

Key Takeaways from the Court Order

1. No Systemic Breach Identified: The court confirmed there was no evidence of a systemic breach affecting NEET-UG 2024 beyond isolated incidents in Patna and Hazaribagh.

2. Expanded Review Panel: The review panel led by former ISRO chief K. Radhakrishnan will now have an expanded mandate to assess the NTA’s functioning and recommend reforms by September 30. The court has also asked the Education Ministry to formulate a program to be implemented in a month and then inform about the development after two weeks.

3. Standard Operating Procedures: The panel will develop standard operating procedures for technological improvements and address the issues encountered during NEET-UG 2024. “…we have highlighted all errors of NTA and thus the committee should identify and rectify these. These issues which have arisen must be rectified by the Union of India this year itself so that it is not repeated,” the CJI added.

4. Avoid 'Flip-Flops': The Chief Justice of India (CJI) told NTA that it must avoid “flip-flops” in its decision-making, as it does not serve the interests of students. The court highlighted various errors committed by the NTA, such as keeping the rear door open in the strong room, granting compensatory marks, and awarding grace marks.

5. Enhance Security Measures : The court directed the NTA to improve identity checks and explore new technologies to prevent impersonation, including secure transport for question papers.

What happened so far? A timeline of events:

Published on: Friday, August 02, 2024, 02:13 PM IST

RECENT STORIES