Thane Sessions Court Rejects CA Pravin Poddar’s Anticipatory Bail In ₹851 Crore GST Fraud Case
Thane Sessions Court rejected anticipatory bail for CA Pravin Poddar in an alleged ₹851 crore GST fraud case, observing that custodial interrogation is necessary given the serious financial irregularities.

Thane Sessions Court denies anticipatory bail to Chartered Accountant Pravin Poddar in an alleged multi-crore GST fraud case | File Photo
Thane, March 3: The Thane Sessions Court has rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by Chartered Accountant Pravin Poddar in connection with an alleged GST fraud case involving transactions worth crores of rupees.
In its four-page order, the court, presided over by Judge R.S. Bhakare, observed, “The present applicant, Poddar, was doing the yearly audit of Unicon Tie Up Pvt. Ltd. Transactions of about Rs 851 crore have taken place in the said company. A huge amount is involved in the offence, causing wrongful loss to the government. Considering the serious nature of the offence, custodial interrogation of the applicant appears necessary.”
Allegations of forged GST registration
According to the prosecution, the complaint was lodged by a Sales Tax Inspector from the Goods and Services Tax office at Mazgaon, Mumbai. The main accused, Naresh Yakub Athavale, allegedly posed as a registered GST trader as the proprietor of M/s Splash Traders.
Investigations revealed that Athavale allegedly submitted forged documents and false information in GST Form No. 1 to obtain registration under the GST Act. Based on the allegedly fraudulent registration, he is accused of securing GST returns amounting to Rs 1,85,88,851, thereby causing wrongful loss to the government.
Transactions and notice under BNSS
The prosecution further stated that transactions worth approximately Rs 851 crore took place in Unicon Tie Up Pvt. Ltd., and that Rs 59 lakh was transferred from M/s Splash Traders to the company on February 15, 2019.
It was also submitted that despite a notice issued under Section 94 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), Poddar did not appear before the investigating officer.
Also Watch:
The defence argued that Poddar was not named in the FIR, claimed innocence and contended that the case was based on documentary evidence, making custodial interrogation unnecessary. However, the court rejected the plea, citing the seriousness of the allegations.
To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/
RECENT STORIES
-
Asian Games 2026: Athletics Provides Depth But Fewer Golds As India Battles On At Asiad -
India Create History With Record 406-Run Chase Against West Indies, Become 2nd Team To Chase 400+... -
Mumbai's 12-Year-Old Agastya Mittal Creates History With Triple Crown At Maharashtra Billiards &... -
India Captain Shubman Gill Smashes Fastest Double Century In ODI History During IND Vs WI 2nd ODI;... -
Pilot Attacked, Plane Plunges 17,400 Ft: How Passengers, Pilots & Crew Saved 180 Lives Aboard...
