Mumbai: Court Denies Anticipatory Bail To Student Accused Of Extorting ₹1.5 Crore From Advocate
The Dindoshi sessions court rejected the anticipatory bail plea of 27-year-old student Parul Rana, accused of extorting ₹1.5 crore from a Mumbai advocate by threatening to leak compromising photos. The court noted her refusal to cooperate and cited prima facie evidence of extortion. It stated that consensual relations aren’t illegal but denied bail due to her conduct and criminal antecedents.

Mumbai: Court Denies Anticipatory Bail To Student Accused Of Extorting ₹1.5 Crore From Advocate | File Pic (Representative Image)
Mumbai: The Dindoshi sessions court has rejected the anticipatory bail plea of 27-year-old student Parul Rana, accused of extorting Rs 1.50 crore from a city-based advocate. The complainant, known for representing India internationally, alleged that Rana threatened to make compromising photographs viral if he failed to pay. The court, while dismissing the plea, observed that sexual relations between consenting adults are not an offence in India.
It noted that partial receipt of money through online transactions was undisputed and that specific allegations of extortion existed. The FIR prima facie showed that Rana possessed compromising photographs and threatened to make them public. According to the complainant, he met Rana in May 2024 through a mutual friend and stayed in touch. On June 6, while attending a conference in Geneva, Rana allegedly sought financial help for a medical emergency, prompting him to transfer Rs 2.5 lakh.
ALSO READ
He paid another Rs 2.5 lakh in July and Rs 5 lakh from a friend’s account on July 9. The two travelled to Bali later that month, with expenses borne by him, during which Rana allegedly demanded Rs 20 lakh. Suspecting deceit, he began distancing himself. The advocate further alleged that on July 31, Rana and her sister stayed at his house, taking Rs 10 lakh while leaving. He claimed to have given Rana Rs 1.50 crore in cash and Rs 50 lakh online. As he withdrew from the relationship, Rana allegedly threatened to implicate him in a false rape case and make his photographs viral.
He also reported threats from Rana and her family to him and his wife, leading to a complaint at Goregaon police station. Rana denied receiving Rs 1.50 crore and argued that no cheating offence was established. She claimed inadequate time to attend a police summons due to residing in another state. However, the court noted her refusal to appear, citing fear of arrest in another case, and concluded that her conduct showed unwillingness to cooperate. Citing her criminal antecedents and role as the prime accused, the court refused anticipatory bail, stating her absence could impede the investigation.
To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/
RECENT STORIES
-
'It Will Happen': Abhishek Sharma’s New Tattoo Captures His Fearless Mindset -
Gold Prices Climb ₹328 To ₹1,24,241 Per 10 Grams, Mirroring Gains In Global Markets Amid Renewed... -
Bank Of Baroda Apprentice Recruitment 2025: Application Process For 2,700 Posts Begins; Check... -
'Many Ministers Will Go To Jail...': Congress Leader Ramesh Chennithala On Sabarimala Gold Theft... -
Govinda Discharged From Hospital: Actor Shares Health Update, Says 'I Did Excessive Hard Work & Was...