Bombay HC Restrains Use Of ‘Jio’ Trademark For Taxi Services, Grants Interim Relief To Reliance Industries
The Bombay High Court has granted an interim injunction in favour of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), restraining certain parties from using its registered ‘JIO’ trademark for taxi services being offered under the domain name www.jiocabs.com.

Bombay HC Restrains Use Of ‘Jio’ Trademark For Taxi Services, Grants Interim Relief To Reliance Industries | File Photo
Mumbai: The Bombay High Court has granted an interim injunction in favour of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), restraining certain parties from using its registered ‘JIO’ trademark for taxi services being offered under the domain name www.jiocabs.com.
Prima Facie Case Established
Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan, on Tuesday, granted the interim protection observing that Reliance had established a strong prima facie case and that continued use of the well-known brand by unauthorised parties could cause serious harm to its goodwill.
“The continued usage of a well-known and protected brand name would indeed cause grave injury,” the court said, adding that “considering the mending of ways by the Defendants, even the balance of convenience would be in favour of grant of the ad-interim relief.”
Arguments By Reliance
Advocate Vinod Bhahat, representing Reliance, argued that it is the registered proprietor of the ‘JIO’ mark, which is protected across multiple classes. The company contended that the use of the mark ‘Jiocabs’ and the associated domain name amounted to trademark infringement and passing off. The website and its promotional material allegedly used names, logos, and artistic elements identical or deceptively similar to Reliance’s registered marks.
History And Evidence
RIL informed the court that it had adopted the JIO mark in 2016 and obtained registrations dating back to 2011 and 2012. The company described the mark as a “well-known trademark”, supported by extensive evidence including screenshots, WhatsApp conversations, and promotional images showing active misuse of its brand identity.
Defendants’ Conduct Noted
Although the defendants had altered some content following receipt of a legal notice, Reliance submitted that they continued to hold and operate the disputed domain name, thereby perpetuating confusion among consumers.
The court noted that despite being served, the defendants had not entered an appearance. However, it acknowledged that they appeared to have “mended their approach” by shifting to a new name, though the domain name www.jiocabs.com was still active.
Interim Relief Granted
Having considered the rival marks, labels, and the conduct of the parties, the court held that an urgent interim order was justified. The bench restrained the defendants from using the ‘JIO’ mark, the impugned domain name, or any logos, labels, or artwork identical or deceptively similar to Reliance’s trademarks or copyrighted material.
Also Watch:
Next Hearing
The defendants have been permitted to file their affidavit in reply within four weeks. The matter is kept for further hearing on November 28, 2025.
To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/
RECENT STORIES
-
Gold Prices Fall As Investors Book Profits After Both Metals Hit Record Highs In Previous Session -
Horrific Videos Of Myanmar Military Strike On Anti-Junta Protest & Thadingyut Full Moon Festival... -
Vivo V60e 5G vs Realme 15 Pro 5G vs OnePlus Nord 5: Price, Specifications Compared -
SWAYAM 2025 July Semester Registration Begins At exams.nta.nic.in; Apply For 648 Courses Across... -
PM Modi Receives UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer At Raj Bhavan In Mumbai; Bilateral Talks To Follow |...