Supreme Court Declines To Interfere With Bombay HC Order For Removal Of Shivaji Maharaj Statue In Goa

The Supreme Court declined to interfere with a Bombay High Court order directing removal of a Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj statue from Mormugao Port Authority land in Goa. The bench allowed the petitioners to withdraw their plea, granting liberty to approach the High Court again. The High Court had ruled that the statue was installed in violation of local laws.

Add FPJ As a
Trusted Source
Supreme Court Declines To Interfere With Bombay HC Order For Removal Of Shivaji Maharaj Statue In Goa
ANI Updated: Monday, July 06, 2026, 08:38 PM IST
Supreme Court Declines To Interfere With Bombay HC Order For Removal Of Shivaji Maharaj Statue In Goa

Supreme Court Declines To Interfere With Bombay HC Order For Removal Of Shivaji Maharaj Statue In Goa | File Pic

New Delhi [India], July 6: The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with an order of the Bombay High Court directing the removal of a statue of Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj from land belonging to the Mormugao Port Authority.

Also Watch:

Petition withdrawn in Supreme Court
As a bench of Justices MM Sundresh and Justice Sheel Nagu was not inclined to pass a favourable order, the petitioners chose to withdraw the case and the same was dismissed as withdrawn.

It, however, gave the petitioners liberty to move an appropriate application before the High Court to seek a variance of its order.

"Counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the present Special Leave Petition. Permission is granted. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate application before the High Court and seek variance of the impugned order," the order passed on July 2 stated.

High Court observations on legality
The petitioners contended before the top court that the High Court had effectively granted final relief while deciding an interim application.

The bench was hearing an appeal against the High Court direction which ordered removal of the statue from the Port Authority land holding that it was installed in "gross violation" of local laws and constructed illegally.

The High Court also criticised the authorities and the Goa administration for remaining "mere bystanders" while the statue was allegedly installed without legal authorisation.

Allegations before High Court
According to the Mormugao Port Authority's plea before the High Court, despite lodging repeated complaints with the local Bogda Police Station and other authorities, no action was taken.

The Authority alleged that the land at Vasco-da-Gama had been forcibly encroached upon by certain residents, purportedly with the support of MLA Sankalp Amonkar, his wife, and other local corporators.

The High Court observed that despite repeated assertions that removing the structure could give rise to a law and order situation, the authorities had failed to take any action.

(Except for the headline, this article has not been edited by FPJ's editorial team and is auto-generated from an agency feed.)

Published on: Monday, July 06, 2026, 08:38 PM IST

RECENT STORIES