Mumbai BMC Elections 2026: Citizens Accuse Candidates Of Dodging Public Scrutiny In Sion, Matunga And Wadala
Residents of Mumbai’s Wards 172, 177 and 178 have accused BMC election candidates of avoiding direct engagement with educated voters. Citizen groups claim candidates ignored a detailed questionnaire and refused public Q&A sessions, fuelling anger over lack of accountability and merit-based campaigning.

Residents of Sion, Matunga and Wadala allege that BMC poll candidates are avoiding direct interaction and public questioning ahead of elections | File Photo (Representational Image)
Mumbai, Jan 13: As the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections draw near, a wave of resentment is surging through the residential pockets of Wards 172, 177 and 178, including Sion (E), Matunga (E) and Wadala.
Citizens in these areas have accused their prospective representatives of “political cowardice”, alleging that candidates are deliberately avoiding direct engagement with educated voters.
Citizens’ questionnaire meets silence
The friction stems from a citizen-led initiative in which residents and members of the F-North Ward Citizens’ Federation, Petition Group Foundation and Hindu Colony Residents’ Association drafted a comprehensive questionnaire designed to test the candidates’ merit, technical knowledge of urban issues, and specific plans for the wards. According to the group, the response from all nine candidates has been a resounding silence.
Candidates avoid direct interaction
Residents alleged that while candidates are visible during loud rallies and padyatras, they vanish the moment they are asked to sit down for a Q&A session.
They added that while a few candidates initially agreed to speak with citizens at a ‘Meet Your Candidate’ event, they discontinued conversations immediately after being asked to respond to the questionnaire.
Details sought from candidates
According to the residents, the six-page-long questionnaire involved questions about the candidates’ achievements, important issues in the ward, their vision to solve these issues and other commitments. It also asked candidates to share details of their qualifications, criminal history, profession and income.
Allegations of selective outreach
Residents alleged that candidates have been targeting “soft audiences” and areas where they can distribute doles, rather than facing “aware and educated” citizens who demand accountability. Residents of these wards said they want to shift the election narrative from party loyalty to individual merit.
Also Watch:
ALSO READ
Chetan Trivedi, a member of Petition Group, said, “The candidates did not confirm their time for the meeting when we requested them to fill the questionnaire because they wanted a scripted talk. Ultimately, none of them accepted the request for public interaction.”
To get details on exclusive and budget-friendly property deals in Mumbai & surrounding regions, do visit: https://budgetproperties.in/
RECENT STORIES
-
Alpha Makers Unveil Sharvari's Character Poster; Netizens React Hilariously & Connect It To A... -
NEET UG 2026 Re-Exam: NTA Clarifies Abu Dhabi Centre Allotment, Says Nagpur Candidate Changed Centre... -
'Pakistan Doesn't Have Press Freedom': US Vice Prez JD Vance Explains Delay In Releasing Iran Peace... -
VIDEO: Dombivli GRP Cop Saves 70-Year-Old Man Who Slips While Attempting To Board Moving Mumbai... -
India’s Urban Housing Sector Set For Structural Shift Amid Rapid Urbanisation: KPMG
