MP News: High Court Rejects Habeas Corpus Seeking Man’s Release

The Madhya Pradesh High Court at Jabalpur dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by Aarti Sharma seeking her husband’s release. The bench led by Sanjeev Sachdeva and Vinay Saraf held his custody lawful, noting he had not complied with bail conditions in an earlier criminal case, rejecting claims of illegal detention.

Add FPJ As a
Trusted Source
MP News: High Court Rejects Habeas Corpus Seeking Man’s Release
Staff Reporter Updated: Tuesday, March 24, 2026, 08:05 PM IST
MP News: High Court Rejects Habeas Corpus Seeking Man’s Release

MP News: High Court Rejects Habeas Corpus Seeking Man’s Release | Representative Image

Bhopal (Madhya Pradesh): The principal bench of thew Madhya Pradesh high court, Jabalpur, has dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed by a woman seeking the production and release of her husband, holding that his custody could not be termed illegal when he had failed to comply with bail conditions in an earlier case.

A division bench comprising chief justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and justice Vinay Saraf passed the order. Petitioner Aarti Sharma had alleged that her husband, Rakesh Sharma, was being kept in unlawful detention as he had not been produced before the jurisdictional magistrate within the stipulated time after his arrest in a subsequent criminal case.

The petitioner’s advocate Saket Agrawal argued that Sharma had been formally arrested on January 7, 2026, in connection with a case registered at Harpalpur police station of Chhatarpur district and ought to have been produced before the magistrate within 24 hours. It was contended that despite a production warrant being issued, he was only produced on March 6, 2026, rendering his custody between January 8 and March 6 illegal.

Sharma had first been arrested on December 4, 2025, in a criminal case registered at Rampura police station of Neemuch, for offences punishable under Section 420 of the IPC. While he remained in custody in that case, he was formally arrested in the second case on January 7, 2026.

Till the bail bonds were furnished in terms of order it could not be said that the custody of the husband of the petitioner was illegal or wrongful and as such no habeas corpus could be issued in the facts and circumstances of the case, the court said.

Published on: Tuesday, March 24, 2026, 09:30 PM IST

RECENT STORIES