Mumbai News: NCLT Initiates Insolvency Resolution Against Jitendra Kikavat, Personal Guarantor For ₹66.35 Crore Loan
Jitendra Kikavat stood personal guarantee for a Rs65 crore bank loan given to Mahavir Roads and Infrastructure.

Representational Image
Mumbai: The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Mumbai has initiated an Insolvency Resolution Process against Jitendra Kikavat, the personal guarantor for a substantial bank loan given by Bank of Baroda. This action follows a petition filed under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code by the Bank of Baroda against Kikavat.
Kikavat had provided a personal guarantee for a bank loan amounting to Rs. 66,35,16,757.11, which was extended to M/s Mahavir Roads and Infrastructure Private Limited.
ALSO READ
Kikavat, however, has opposed the insolvency proceedings against him, arguing that the Guarantee Letter was insufficiently stamped according to the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Kikavat's arguments also claim that the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and the petition are impacting ongoing settlement negotiations with the Bank of India. Additionally, he contends that the amount claimed by the Bank of Baroda is unjustly inflated.
The NCLT rejected Kikavat's argument, citing the Supreme Court’s judgment in N.N. Global Mercantile vs. Indo Unique Flame & Ors. The Supreme Court clarified that under Section 35 of the Stamp Act, an instrument with insufficient stamp duty is not void but inadmissible in evidence. The NCLT noted that the non-payment of stamp duty is considered a curable defect as the Stamp Act provides a procedure for curing such defects, making it clear that the issue does not invalidate the guarantee but rather requires correction according to the established procedure.
The Tribunal, while rejecting Kikavat’s argument, stated, “The proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) are not intended to enforce the guarantee but are meant for the resolution of the insolvency of the personal guarantor. Accordingly, we do not find any merit in this argument.”
ALSO READ
The Bank of Baroda, in its application, stated that it had provided documents including a sanction letter, a deed of guarantee, and a demand notice invoking the guarantee concerning the unpaid debt owed by the corporate debtor, M/s Mahavir Roads and Infrastructure Private Limited. According to the guarantee deed, Kikavat is liable to pay Rs. 30,00,00,000 plus interest at a rate of 14.25% and other costs. A demand notice was issued by the petitioner requesting payment of Rs. 66,35,16,757.11, which includes unapplied interest and relevant charges. The respondent, Kikavat, did not respond to or make any payments following this notice.The bank thus had approached the NCLT in 2022, seeking relief in then case.
RECENT STORIES
-
Madhuri Dixit Rents Commercial Space In Mumbai's Lower Parel At ₹4.25 Lakh Per Month -
What Are Uncrewed Drone Speedboats? The US Navy's New Weapon Against Iran, Explained -
Five Of Same Family Killed, Five Critically Injured As Speeding SUV Rams Autorickshaw In Gwalior -
Project Hail Mary Box Office Collection Day 1 India: Ryan Gosling Starrer Takes Low Opening Amid... -
Global Markets See Worst Fall Since 2022, Stocks Swing As Oil Nears $108 & Bond Yields Rise To 4.42%
