Mumbai: HC relief for Khadi and Village Industries Commission

In a relief for the Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC), the Bombay High Court on Wednesday temporarily restrained a Mumbai-based association from using the ‘Khadi’ and ‘Charkha’ logo belonging to the Commission.

Urvi MahajaniUpdated: Friday, December 16, 2022, 02:55 AM IST
article-image
Twitter; @airnewsalerts

Mumbai: In a relief for the Khadi and Village Industries Commission (KVIC), the Bombay High Court on Wednesday temporarily restrained a Mumbai-based association from using the ‘Khadi’ and ‘Charkha’ logo belonging to the Commission.

Justice Manish Pitale issued the restraining order while hearing an application filed by KVIC claiming that one Mumbai Khadi and Village Industries Association was using the registered marks in conjunction with its name. It contended that the association infringed the word mark, label mark and device mark registered in favour of KVIC, which it discovered in Dec 2021.

The court was informed that KVIC had earlier filed a suit against the association, which was withdrawn following the latter giving an undertaking before the HC that it would not sell any Khadi products without a certificate from KVIC. The continued infringement was not only dishonest but also a breach of the undertaking given to the court, KVIC pleaded.

However, the association opposed the plea claiming that KVIC’s claims were based on elaborate certificates of registration for trademark, label mark and device mark but it was all of no consequence. It produced annual reports to show that it was the prior user of the word ‘Khadi’ since they used it from the year 1946.

Justice Pitale noted that the association had approached KVIC for a certificate to sell Khadi products. However, KVIC began receiving complaints that the cloth being sold didn’t contain Khadi material. Hence, it withdrew the certificate. Even after withdrawal of the certificate, the association continued selling products under the name and trademark.

In its order, the court noted that KVIC held registration for its wordmark, label mark and device mark, for a plethora of classes and not limited to cloth or textile products.

“On the face of it, the defendant cannot dispute that the prominent, essential, fundamental and substantial features of the registered trademarks of KVIC are copied in the impugned marks of the defendant. This would ordinarily satisfy the requirement of demonstrating a prima facie case as regards infringement and passing-off,” remarked Justice Pitale.

The judge also said that unless the defendant is restrained from further indulging in such conduct, KVIC will suffer grave and irreparable loss.

(If you have a story in and around Mumbai, you have our ears, be a citizen journalist and send us your story here. )

(To receive our E-paper on WhatsApp daily, please click here.  To receive it on Telegram, please click here. We permit sharing of the paper's PDF on WhatsApp and other social media platforms.)

RECENT STORIES

Mumbai: Nepali woman dies by suicide in Dongri guest house, probe ordered

Mumbai: Nepali woman dies by suicide in Dongri guest house, probe ordered

Mumbai-Vadodara Expressway: Bombay HC allows felling of 350 mangroves

Mumbai-Vadodara Expressway: Bombay HC allows felling of 350 mangroves

Navi Mumbai: CIDCO MD makes surprise visit to Nerul, Koparkhairane railway stations, shows...

Navi Mumbai: CIDCO MD makes surprise visit to Nerul, Koparkhairane railway stations, shows...

Navi Mumbai: 484 out of 1500 proposed CCTV cameras installed, 19 operational

Navi Mumbai: 484 out of 1500 proposed CCTV cameras installed, 19 operational

Mumbai: Fire breaks out in single-storey building in Borivali West; no injuries reported

Mumbai: Fire breaks out in single-storey building in Borivali West; no injuries reported