Don't derail working system, says SC on judges' appointment

The Supreme Court on Friday reserved its decision on a case filed by activist lawyer Anjali Bhardwaj, seeking details of a controversial 2018 meeting of the Supreme Court collegium.

FPJ BureauUpdated: Saturday, December 03, 2022, 01:21 AM IST
article-image
Supreme Court of India | Photo: Representative Image

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday reserved its decision on a case filed by activist lawyer Anjali Bhardwaj, seeking details of a controversial 2018 meeting of the Supreme Court collegium.

The system is “most transparent,” said a bench of Justices M R Shah and C T Ravikumar, noting not to derail a system that is working. It said let the collegium do its job. “It has become a fashion for former members of the collegium to comment on the decisions.”

Lawyer Prashant Bhushan, appearing for the petitioner asked, “Are the decisions of the collegium answerable under RTI? That's the question. Don't the people of this country have the right to know?"

He wanted all correspondence between the chief justice of India and the government to be made available to the public.

Justice Shah said, “No resolution was passed in that collegium meeting. We don't want to comment on anything done by former members. It has become fashionable for former members of the collegium to comment on the decisions.”

“We are not backing down. Many verbal decisions are taken,” the judge said while reserving the decision.

In July, the Delhi High Court had dismissed the appeal seeking the agenda, minutes and resolution of a Supreme Court Collegium meeting on December 12, 2018. Before that, the request had been turned down on multiple levels, including the Central Information Commission (CIC).

Bhardwaj, in her petitions, had cited an excerpt from the autobiography of former Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi, titled 'Justice for the Judge', in which he mentioned that the collegium in its December 2018 meeting had agreed to recommend the names of Justice Pradeep Nandrajog, who was then the Chief Justice of Rajasthan High Court, and Justice Rajendra Menon, the then Chief Justice of Delhi High Court, for the Supreme Court.

According to the book, the decision was put on hold as the news of the elevation of two chief justices was leaked and a new collegium, in its resolution dated January 10, 2019, did not approve names of Justice Nandrajog and Justice Menon for elevation. 

(If you have a story in and around Mumbai, you have our ears, be a citizen journalist and send us your story here. )

(To receive our E-paper on WhatsApp daily, please click here.  To receive it on Telegram, please click here. We permit sharing of the paper's PDF on WhatsApp and other social media platforms.)

RECENT STORIES

Narendra Dabholkar case: CBI completes probe 10 years after rationalist's murder, but family says...

Narendra Dabholkar case: CBI completes probe 10 years after rationalist's murder, but family says...

Air India pee-gate: Delhi court reserves order on Shankar Mishra's bail plea

Air India pee-gate: Delhi court reserves order on Shankar Mishra's bail plea

BBC documentary row: Supreme Court agrees to hear plea challenging ban on film; hearing scheduled...

BBC documentary row: Supreme Court agrees to hear plea challenging ban on film; hearing scheduled...

Bombay HC: Financial crisis no excuse for not paying salary

Bombay HC: Financial crisis no excuse for not paying salary

OBC law student knocks on HC door over discrimination by Mumbai University

OBC law student knocks on HC door over discrimination by Mumbai University