Centre attacks collegium system

Centre attacks collegium system

FPJ BureauUpdated: Saturday, June 01, 2019, 01:11 AM IST
article-image

Tells SC the system didn’t follow the principle of meritocracy in which many ‘undeserving’ persons became judges

New Delhi : The Centre on Wednesday sharply criticised the erstwhile collegium system of appointing judges saying that it did not follow the principle of meritocracy in which many ‘undeserving’ persons became judges, some of whose names it gave in the Supreme Court.

Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi, who was asked on Tuesday to give a list of ‘bad appointments of judges’ made under the collegium system, today gave seven to eight names of judges who were appointed despite adverse reports from the Intelligence Bureau.

He claimed that when the collegium insisted on such recommendations, the Centre was bound to accept them. “The collegium did not follow the principle of meritocracy in appointing judges and hence, many undeserving persons got appointed as judges”, Rohatgi told a five-judge bench headed by Justice J S Khehar hearing petitions challenging the validity of the National Judicial Appointments Commission  (NJAC) Act.

“In 2013, the proposal of appointing a judge was dropped. Then, why should the Chief Justice of India revive the same proposal before demitting the office. I say how and why it was done. “The proposal was earlier opposed by two judges of this court long back. Then why was it revived. I am just responding to a short query,” he said to a bench which also comprised justices J Chelameswar, M B Lokur, Kurian Joseph and Adarsh Kumar Goel.

On the plea that the appointments were insisted upon by the collegium, the bench said, “You (Centre) had all the means. What was the IB doing. It is not the job of the IB to choose a man of choice…”.

Rohatgi also referred to the appointment of judges in Patna and Madhya Pradesh where appointments were made despite reservations from the Executive. “There is a recent case of Madhya Pradesh. Five names were proposed in April, 2014. The collegium rejected two names due to intra-family division and due to adverse IB report. And later, it recommended one against whom an adverse IB report was there,” he said.

Referring to a recent incident of Madras High Court where a judge issued a contempt notice to the Chief Justice of the High Court, he said, “Many judges appointed by collegium are creating havoc in the country. They do not follow the decorum and discipline.

RECENT STORIES

Delhi Viral Video: Biryani Sold In Plates Featuring Lord Ram's Pictures In Jahangirpuri; Owner...

Delhi Viral Video: Biryani Sold In Plates Featuring Lord Ram's Pictures In Jahangirpuri; Owner...

Live Breaking News Updates: Bombay HC Dismisses Suit Challenging Syedna Muffadal Saifuddin's Dawoodi...

Live Breaking News Updates: Bombay HC Dismisses Suit Challenging Syedna Muffadal Saifuddin's Dawoodi...

Andhra Pradesh Viral Video: Cousins Try To Abduct Bride From Wedding Venue, Hurl Chilli Powder On...

Andhra Pradesh Viral Video: Cousins Try To Abduct Bride From Wedding Venue, Hurl Chilli Powder On...

Nagaland State Lottery Result: April 23, 2024, 1 PM Live - Watch Streaming Of Winners List Of Dear...

Nagaland State Lottery Result: April 23, 2024, 1 PM Live - Watch Streaming Of Winners List Of Dear...

Bihar Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Triangular Contest Expected In Muslim-Dominated Kishanganj As AIMIM...

Bihar Lok Sabha Elections 2024: Triangular Contest Expected In Muslim-Dominated Kishanganj As AIMIM...